<p>@lovelipink
i think they were two different passages
phenomenon was on blogging and alternative was on biography i think?</p>
<p>blogging: account for a phenomenon
YES?</p>
<p>vehement means passionate/zealous</p>
<p>Marginalized was the answer because it referred to her trying to get “oppressed, ordinary people” involved in social justice.</p>
<p>account for a phenomenon is wrong. It was something else…</p>
<p>Lets take a poll (just copy and paste, don’t vote twice):</p>
<p>Vehement (1)
Caustic (0)</p>
<p>Wait, for the multiple of 24 and 10 one, why’d you guys put 3600? Wasn’t it asking for the least possible multiple? If so isn’t it 120? That’s what I put</p>
<p>Account for phenomenon was right. The author asked rhetorically about why people would blog if it is difficult to do, and then followed up with a quote saying people blog because they have something to say.</p>
<p>VT, explain your reasoning.</p>
<p>what were the other options for the accoutn for a phenomenon qustion</p>
<p>What is this account for phenomenon question?!??</p>
<p>Lets take a poll (just copy and paste, don’t vote twice):</p>
<p>Vehement (0)
Caustic (1)</p>
<p>yeapp i got marginalized as well…and for the blogging short one,</p>
<p>i remember overly optimistic, and does anyone remember other choices for the phenomenon one? or at least what the question was?</p>
<p>Lets take a poll (just copy and paste, don’t vote twice):</p>
<p>Vehement (1)
Caustic (0) </p>
<p>neither, both were two extreme. i remember putting something else, anyone remember other choices</p>
<p>Lets take a poll (just copy and paste, don’t vote twice):</p>
<p>Vehement (1)
Caustic (2)</p>
<p>I also had account for phenomenon for BLOG and then new approach or whatever for Ella Baker</p>
<p>Ohhh didn’t read the part about the perfect square part…</p>
<p>Blogging</p>
<p>Account for Phenomenon is what i put.</p>
<p>She talks all about how blogging is a chore and tiresome and tideous and few people would even see your blog. Yet people still blog. This phenomenon is explained by the quote when he blogging expert says that people blog not just for the number of viewers but quality of viewers and for themselves, etc</p>
<p>i put caustic - but now i think it’s vehement…
he wasn’t SEVERELY CRITICAL</p>
<p>@satepicfil archeologist for sure</p>