<p>i said strongly held belief too...I figured that you couldn't call what they were talking about an actual "project"</p>
<p>though i could see someone arguing that written history is a project....</p>
<p>hey guys join CCSAT we can do this faster and better on aim
just go to meebo</p>
<p>the family photo passage,</p>
<p>i don't think it's tradition. the question asked for "absence's METAPHORICAL substitute or s/t." i read it so carefully and put down cluttered space.</p>
<p>and also lucky coin 777..i changed from ur answer to how it is interpreted because in the passage it said both arts and science try to connect with something-this is how they achive universality..so it s the same way..it s how unversality is interpreted..is different</p>
<p>
[quote]
can anyone give me the question for the tribunal..
[/quote]
</p>
<p>it was something about the passage and some kind of judge. i can only vaguely remember.</p>
<p>christina, i think illuminating~~ objective was the answer, although iremember only the illuminating part from my anwer... </p>
<p>bobob, i really hope we're right. what do others think?</p>
<p>i put absence of tradition</p>
<p>christina, i read over the part many times and i was pretty sure it was A, the ways they achieve universality.. and yet i might be wrong..</p>
<p>what did everyone say for the last question of the sailors passage (the last paragraph reveals that the men were _______)... I put like they had not experienced worldy phemonoms? I forget the exact wordingv</p>
<p>bobob, i also put the absence of a sustaining tradition.. all the others didn't make sense to me..</p>
<p>but it didn't ask for what is absent..</p>
<p>andrea: I disagree with "the sea is both dangerous and beautiful" </p>
<p>I think it was that they were oblivious to the beauty</p>
<p>bobmallet, i think it was something like they were oblivious to the natural world around them? i chose that... i think ur talking about the same one =D</p>
<p>i want to clarify the sardonic one... i chose sardonic...</p>
<p>which one do you think it is? baffled? sardonic?</p>
<p>does anyone remember the plums question?</p>
<p>i was debating between something about truth and something about experiments....all i can remember is that i chose the answer that began with "the existence of ..." is that right??</p>
<p>For the one with the three syllables, I don't think it was a dialect, because it didn't say the setting or anything and I don't think it was a double meaning, becauser trhere was none. I think it was jsut her eccentricity b/c for God's Sake the women liked the dark lol</p>
<p>I'm pretty confident it's sardonic.... that was one of my teacher's favorite tone words last year in Lit and lots of the examples were looked at were similar to this passage</p>
<p>dna, i think it's existence of a scientific truth yet to be discovered..</p>
<p>harry, is that the same as "contrary personality"?</p>
<p>Quick questions</p>
<p>:Photography one - what were the choices for the question with obsession? I don't remember putting extreme adults for the answer... but I don't remember the other answer choices either so...</p>
<p>:Main Idea of History passage - i don't think it was to emphasize the importance of history... I put something to do with the benefits of history or something like that</p>
<p>Discuss.</p>