Again, that still doesn’t convince me. Hmmmm, how would that man be unemployed then? He’s certainly not structurally unemployed, and he’s not cyclically unemployed either…</p>
FRQs were so easy. I looked up last night to remind myself how to draw and interpret Money Market, Loanable Funds, and Foreign Exchange Market graphs. I may have gotten a point or two off in total.</p>
No, the girl wasn’t frictionally unemployed. The answer stated that she had multiple job offers but was just contemplating which one to chose. If memory serves correctly the answer was either D or E.</p>
He could be cyclically unemployed. Maybe he can’t find a job in his field of work because of a recession? Or maybe there’s less of a demand for his skills so he’s structurally unemployed.</p>
I reasoned that he couldn’t find a job because he didn’t have the skills, so he was structurally unemployed. She had the choice of getting a job but still didn’t get employed she’s frictionally unemployed.</p>
Lots of google results say students seeking their first job are frictionally unemployed. What else could they be? No other form of unemployment suits them.</p>
Yes, new graduates or people looking to enter the workforce for the first time are considered to be part of the Frictional category. Taken from my AP textbook.</p>
Structurally unemployed? The job market has yet to adapt them into the labor supply.</p>
All it said about the man was that he could not work in his own field, implying that he had options in other fields. He’d therefore be in between jobs, and thus frictionally unemployed? That was my reasoning.</p>
I just reported all of you guys for discussing BOTH FRQS and MC on this thread. Now they will track you down and cancel your scores. It has been done before.</p>
one more day to go till u talk about frqmcq guys. avoid talking about it cause asses will report u for it.
can’t wait for u guys to discuss the frqs cause i am taking macro/micro as a latetest on wed.</p>