<p>Sadly, I studied macro for a whole semester and micro for 2 hours last nite and I think I did better on micro. I thought micro had the easier MC and macro had the easier FR, but there are about a billion opinions out there as it is. I didn't leave any blank. Math Ninjas dont believe in that kinda stuff. Hopin' i got the 5's.</p>
<p>Failed miserably. Of course, I took the class last semester, didn't have the greatest teacher and didn't cover all of the stuff on the test, and I never looked at the stuff again, EVER. So I guess I deserve a 1. But that's okay, because I'm not planning on taking any econ in college. Plus, it was really fun writing letters to the readers instead of answering the (to me) unanswerable questions.</p>
<p>FRQ was sooo easy!!<br>
I finished 2/3 of the problems by the time the reading period was over (10 min). I left 15 minutes early, feeling confident. FOr once, I think my FRQ would help me more than the MC.
One thing I noticed with MC for economics is the Length!! Every answer choice was like 2 lines, and so much reading per quesiton. I was so drowsy by the end of it... Anyway, a pleasant ending for many of us non-latin-ers.</p>
<p>I didn't take classes in either, but reviewed from an old textbook - so old that stagflation was fresh in the mind of the authors. the book wasn't divided between macro/micro, it was just everything at once I think.</p>
<p>I thought micro was waaaay more straightforward than macro</p>
<p>hopefully decent on both</p>
<p>you guys are all crazy...micro was hard as heck, macro was easy as heck</p>
<p>macro = piece of cake... i finished the test before reading period was over.. all i had to do was transfer my answers over and take a nice 40 minute nap
micro = so so but still piece of cake.</p>
<p>micro was such easy crap.</p>
<p>fine... mc was slightly challenging but the free response was a joke!
I did practically everything in the 10 min reading time.</p>
<p>but again.. macro :D I went up to my economics teacher this morning and asked her what government expenditure and fiscal policy meant.</p>
<p>I tried to pretend I was sick but she wouldn't let me take it on an alternate date. I'm a bad actor :(</p>
<p>i guess you guys had micro and then macro? we studied macro and then micro for like 3 weeks...so we were ill prepared</p>
<p>both tests were a breeze ... i think i got over 90% of the total points :) !
yeah... i have a great teacher and its a 1 year course so we cover everything and fairly in depth.
The FRQs were both fairly easy and so was the MC although on MC there were a few that i was unsure about</p>
<p>compared to physics, i actually knew what i was writing on my free response.</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>Microeconomics has to be the easiest AP test out of all of em...</p>
<p>I swear I got at least 58 (most likely 60) on the MC, and a perfect score on the FRQ. Of course, i love economics, and I think i'll major in it.</p>
<p>Macroeconomics was okay...i was too lazy to study, so I don't think I did too well on FRQ #2. Either way, it's all good.</p>
<p>TOTALLY agree with dawgquelle...micro was waaaaayyyyy better than physics...</p>
<p>I'd see what you suckers would say if you saw your micro part 1d free response 2/3 wrong. IMHO, macro MC started out easy, then got harder/quagmirish. Macro FR pretty easy; a few uncertainties on about 2-3 points worth of material. Otherwisee good. Micro MC first half easy, a couple rough spots here and there from then on, but still much better than Macro MC. FR a bit harder than Macro FR but still more than manageable.</p>