<p>unfortunately I decided to party yesterday... so yeah.,..you can imagine....thank god I'm stilla junior and I can retest</p>
<p>I don't remember the problem. But there were a set of three in each. Multiple each number with another to show you have 9 different possibilities. Then look at the endings and find out which ones had 5 or 0. So there were 5 out of that nine.</p>
<p>Goldfish, Crap, I put I.</p>
<p>clearly, it was snobbishness (IMO), which is quite different from cynicism...</p>
<p>Yes. Those types of corrections are easy. I don't se how anyone can get "me" and "I" confused.</p>
<p>@gxing</p>
<p>the numbers were P = {4, 5, 6} and Q = {10, 11, 12}</p>
<p>what is the probability of PxQ = mulitple of 5</p>
<p>is there any way of getting a 750 if you miss 3 math q's?</p>
<p>Did anyone else have the math section that included a question about finding the ratio between two categories according to a given bar graph? I stared at that question for like, 5 minutes, and I couldn't figure it out. I kept getting two possible answers. I'm thinking that section might be an experimental one because the problems in that section were considerably harder than the problems in the other sections. Anyone else see this?</p>
<p>oh yeah, question, if you get 7.5 wrong, would they round up or down? and the blue book doesn't say anything if you get in between for the essay, do they round up or down for that if you get like a 9, oh yeah, and the bar thing was like the last bar, e, actually, not sure, there was one thing thats ratio was bigger, either d or e</p>
<p>Me either. I didn't even understand the problem.</p>
<p>Yeah, the writing Q about the book being published was A (it). It was something like "When (author's name) published (book's title) in (year)...it had instantly established herself as a prominent...". The mistake was "it" because the sentence was talking about the author (note "herself").</p>
<p>Anyone remember the 2 writing Qs that went like this? They were both Sentence Error IDs.</p>
<p>1) Annual visiters to NYC' Central Park number far more than that of Mount Rushmore.</p>
<p>2) The number of people...disadvantage...far exceeds those who will benefit.</p>
<p>My answers:</p>
<p>1) I put "that of Mt. Rushmore" because it was comparing "visitors" to a singular thing?</p>
<p>2) I put "those" because I wasn't sure if number correlated to "those".</p>
<p>yes, goldfish, i think it is, this is by far one of the harder sat math sections, i think the curve will probably be:</p>
<p>1 wrong: 790
2 wrong: 770
3 wrong: 750</p>
<p>@volteface</p>
<p>the answer to the math question was E. 1994</p>
<p>and yes it was an experimental i believe. not because of "harder" problems, but because few other people had that section.</p>
<p>goldfish and NEb: i put "me"</p>
<p>b/c ithis is how u figure it out. it said somethjing along the lines of "thnis person gave this to Jane and I." but if u get rid of Jane, itll read "this person gave this to I" which is WRONG. so it has to be "me". u alwasy take out the first name and then see if I or me makes sense.</p>
<p>
[Quote]
Did anyone else have the math section that included a question about finding the ratio between two categories according to a given bar graph? I stared at that question for like, 5 minutes, and I couldn't figure it out. I kept getting two possible answers. I'm thinking that section might be an experimental one because the problems in that section were considerably harder than the problems in the other sections. Anyone else see this?
[/Quote]
</p>
<p>The answer was two. All you had to do was compare the two graphs and find the ratio, that's all.</p>
<p>thanks juliana btw...WOOT!</p>
<p>what about the writing q with the "It was a chinese american grower..."</p>
<p>was the answer e (correct)?</p>
<p>For some reason "Himself" comes to mind, anyone remember what that was about? I don't remember if that was important, but it is bugging me since I'm thinking about the word.</p>
<p>The Math Q with the graph of water deph was 18. The Q told you that each line on the Y axis represented 1 feet. And the water deph BTW 3PM and 4PM decreased by 10%. If u looked at the graph, you would have seen that there were 2 lines between the respective points for 3PM and 4PM. Thus 2 is 10% of what? 20. However, that was the water deph at 3PM - you had to subtract 2 from 20 to get 18 feet.</p>
<p>Edit: I just realized the previous posts were talking about another graph on the Math section. - -;</p>
<p>For the Chinese American one, I put "succeeded with adapting". I was torn BTW that and E, though...</p>
<p>Sweentess215, thanks.</p>
<p>The graph one was the last choice. It was 1600:800 and the previous best was 2000:1600.</p>
<p>No, the problem was adapting "with", it was adapting "to".</p>
<p>this is the Chinese one in the W edction, btw.</p>