OFFICIAL October 8, 2005 SAT I Forum

<p>i put that cecil was underhanded....why is it inapt?</p>

<p>That Cecil passage was the worst passage for me</p>

<p>abm - I got those answers, except for the honor one -- anyone remember that question?</p>

<p>anticipate the future was right too, i think</p>

<p>I really hope that the section with the firetruck is the math experimental, because I didn't have enought time go through them carefully. Mid-way through that section, I was totally panicked to find out that I filled up the ovals in completely wrong place for the previous reading section. I put the answers for section 4 in section 3! how the hell did that even happen! So I ended up spending a lot of time fixing this nightmarish mistake, trying to copy the answers from section 3 to 4. I did manage the correct the mistake. but it was a heavy blow to me and took away my confidence.</p>

<p>yes i got 4 for the arc one and for the other one with the x + 1/x something about t i put -2 i think</p>

<p>Math
70/3
47 x 53
sq-root 29
1300 (fill in)
II
spheres - 22
jkn - 0 </p>

<p>CR
simplistic
honored
emblem
circumscribed
the cecile one was inapt because it made him seem vain
big and little
sense meant "impression" (although i thought consensus could have worked too)</p>

<p>I said impression...</p>

<p>what is 70/3 the answer to?</p>

<p>I put down t = 1.. I thought it asked for positive integers or something. Not sure, the marching band was playing outside, so.. lol</p>

<p>I know I did 53x47 but I don't remember filling in a 2,000+ number haha</p>

<p>Math
70/3
47 x 53
sq-root 29
1300 (fill in)
II
4 on arc
spheres - 22
jkn - 0 </p>

<p>CR
simplistic
honored
emblem
circumscribed
the cecile one was inapt because it made him seem vain
big and little
sense meant "impression" (although i thought consensus could have worked too)</p>

<p>firetruck section isn't dummy it was on my which has writing as dummy</p>

<p>for the cecil passage..there was a question about cecil asking himself about the thing about "lucy reaching to me like reaching for a star"..i chose the thing about his apparent unoriginality...</p>

<p>cecil "regratabbly underhanded" because he was "disappointed and felt sorry" for his remarks</p>

<p>cecil "regratabbly underhanded" because he was "disappointed and felt sorry" for his remarks. crap i am going to cry my eyes out.</p>

<p>who got 1081 and what was it for in math</p>

<p>the answer "anticipate the future" was a different question
- anticipate the future was referring to beebes (or w/e his name was)..that he drew the picture in his notebook based on a prediction
- the one i answered "metaphor was inapt" was asking somehting like how did cecile ultimately view the metaphor he used.
- then, the next question in the section (the last one)... the answer was vain.</p>

<p>For the 2 circles with the 80 degree angle and its arc length, are you supposed to incorporate pie into the answer? When you use pie to find the diameter the answer comes out to 1.26 (around there), when you don't use pie the answer comes out to 4. I put filled in either 1 or 2 (whichever one was listed) becuase they were the closest to the actual answer. Looking back the correct answer seems to be 4, but how come they didn't use pie, am I missing something?</p>

<p>darn i got circumscribed wrong....i knew I did</p>

<p>Also: my proctor ended the essay 2 minutes early, which was horrible for my concluding paragraph (or lack thereof). :(</p>

<p>Otherwise, I thought I did pretty well. Except for the marbles question, but I think that was in the experimental section. </p>

<p>Thank god the experimental was a math!</p>

<p>the section about mrs honeychurch and her piano has to be the experimental one (i hope)</p>

<p>I said t = 1. it was between -1 and 1 for me...and i went with 1. Can anyone else confirm this?</p>