***Official SAT I June 2013***

<p>ohsnapitspri - yup that’s what i put</p>

<p>bhchamp - i put suppose to, because it should’ve been past tense: supposed to</p>

<p>The phrase “suppose to” does not exist.</p>

<p>@bhchamp no “suppose to” is always wrong. there’s only supposed to.
anyone remember full text of 28? the “in hope to generate” one</p>

<p>@ohsnapitspri yup that’s what i said. the only other viable answer was B) commerial value, and the passage didn’t discuss that fact until later.</p>

<p>Do you happen to remember #24 and #25 of the violin passages?</p>

<p>@albert I believe it was something about people running for office but not expecting to win, they were actually just running “in hope to generate” public interest</p>

<p>does anyone remember any jane austen answers/questions? I don’t know if it was just me, but it was kinda difficult…</p>

<p>Is there a consolidated list of answers to the writing anywhere?</p>

<p>Hey guys! Can someone please tell me which writing section was experimental? Was the experimental the section with the chewing gum passage? Or the section with the art preservation and frescoes in the Sistine Chapel?</p>

<p>@ singer316 - Chewing gum was the real one.</p>

<p>chapel was the experimental…thank god that one was so hard! Were the questions:
“The two women both started their careers at a time when …”
and “The plants stand a better chance of/at survival” also in the experimental section?
If they weren’t, what are the answer??? D:</p>

<p>how about the “inability” one?..i only remember one choice, surmountable</p>

<p>@mauvepauve I put “inevitable” because the line references were referring to a part of the passage that said that the costs were very high and they might not get lowered. Correct me if I’m wrong… I had trouble with that question.</p>

<p>@DivisionByZero Thank you so much!</p>

<p>@Etshine Hmm I don’t remember those questions. Do you remember what you put as your answer?</p>

<p>Anyone remember what the primary purpose of the violin passage was? “Explain a recent discovery” or “discuss a remarkable artifact” …?</p>

<p>For the Navajo one, it should be ansestor of. It is singular instead of plural</p>

<p>Guys for the buttermilk one i put none because the subject is buttermilk and that’s singular. None is only used in referral to plural
I had none of the ITEMS
not I had none of the item</p>

<p>@ singer They were writing questions about identifying sentence errors. </p>

<p>The women one was about two different english women both considered as the first women actors because they started their careers at the same time. For that I put no error. (but wasnt sure if the their careers should be “her career”)</p>

<p>The plant one was about plants surviving or something. I put no error for that one but wasn’t sure if “of survival” should be “at survival”</p>

<p>okay so: “some candidates run not to win the election but in the hopes to generate publicity…”</p>

<p>wouldn’t this be no error since parallelism says “to generate” is right instead of of generating?</p>

<p>@ albert29 it’s a preposition thing. You don’t say “in hopes to generate” you say “in hopes of generating”</p>

<p>@ Etshine: you’re probably right because two women is plural, so their would be corresponding. And I don’t remember thinking that there needed to be “her” career. Luckily, there’s always a chance it might have been in the experimental section! :)</p>

<p>I got 26 for function one, and changed 3/2 to 2/3 ( :</p>

<p>The only question I had was if x=(360/x) and said (x)(1/2) which =(360/x)(1/2) and the x could count just as a 1, so you would do 360 times .5 to get 180. I know the answer is 720 but how? I would get the easiest math question wrong…</p>

<p>@ flashcards - You were right! :slight_smile: and you just do 360/(1/2). You sub in 1/2 for x and then solve for the function value.</p>

<p>@singer but didn’t it say (x)(1/2) so you would multiply x which is (360/1) and multiply .5 to get 180?</p>