<p>Roosevelt question: Blacks. Roosevelt was a Democrat, and Blacks didn't switch from Republicans to Democrats until much later.</p>
<p>Oh what about that question about 1890ish, how expansion changed or something, I think i picked that we started to expand in foregin land, but now that I think of it I think it would be something to do with the government passing legislation to settle west or something</p>
<ol>
<li><p>i said small shop owners...because the mail-order catalogs would take business away from them?</p></li>
<li><p>that cartoon totally stumped. i said the thing about advertisement..but i doubt it's right.</p></li>
</ol>
<ol>
<li><p>I said small merchants and business owners. The railroads would be shipping the stuf; they would like it. The small busnisses however, would be put out of business.</p></li>
<li><p>Yes</p></li>
</ol>
<p>evil<em>asian</em>dictator:
1. Farmers, because it was an advertisement that used the railroads and I think the question asked which would be most opposed.
2. Yeah, Teapot dome.</p>
<p>evil - 1 - I said it was the small town merchant/shopkeepers
2 - Yea I said teapot scandal</p>
<p>no...blacks switched to democrats during the New Deal</p>
<p>Do you mean the Roosevlet coalition question? Because that was definatly industrialists.</p>
<p>werent mexican american relations bad cuz they took germany's side during wwi.....zimmerman note rmember?</p>
<p>transcedentalists.. yepp self reliance</p>
<p>farmers.... for the railroad thing.</p>
<p>teapot dome is correct.</p>
<p>also what was different about the cherokees?
i put the court case</p>
<p>evil asian - for the 'mail order' one, I put the small business owners cause I would imagine they wouldn't want a huge business taking their local businsess away.</p>
<p>damn I missed the roosevelt one</p>
<p>I put teapoit dome, I thought the buildings were being bought though...</p>
<p>wilson one was about getting public support or whatev right?</p>
<p>NY was indians/french</p>
<p>Canada was lack of colonists</p>
<p>skipped that woman one w/ vice-presidency, I had no idea</p>
<p>missed the international washington --> I put the phillipines </p>
<p>dred scott - answer I put was that 'AFRICAN AMERICANS' could not petition in court... didn't see any of them specific to slaves.</p>
<p>bah i'm hopin for a 700+...... not sure if it'll happen though</p>
<p>I took USH 3rd....... my concentration was shot after Chem and Physics.</p>
<p>about mexican relations..i said when pershing went off to capture Pancho Villa</p>
<p>i picked tha ttoo</p>
<p>No, cuz the Mexicans actually said no to the offer in the zimmerman note (although they did so after the Allies intercepted it), so it actually made the U.S. mad at Germany - a reason why they entered the war on the side of the allies
I said Pancho Villa</p>
<p>First running lady VP was someone with the last name Farraro</p>
<p>Wait, why is there controversy over the Dred Scott Q? I thought the answer was like blacks couldn't sue in court. Does it matter that it didn't say "slave" cuz blacks weren't considered citizens back then.</p>
<p>i got lack of capital too for the ny one</p>
<p>yep farraro is right.</p>
<p>canada.. lack of colonists?? i'm totally not sure!!</p>
<p>what about what was an indicator the economy was doing bad in the 1920s</p>
<p>Economy was doing bad because of farm prices. </p>
<p>Are there any NEW Qs that we haven't discussed?</p>
<p>canada-- def. lack of colonists</p>
<p>1920's--- agriculture</p>