<p>She chose Chicago because she liked the idea of the core, and the intellectualism of the student body, and because it seemed to have a huge number of people who were a lot like her. And because it was in a big, cool city, and it wasn't fratty/preppy. (And, frankly, because she didn't get into Columbia. Not so much because she liked Columbia more than UChicago, but because she liked Manhattan and the Upper West Side a lot more than Chicago and Hyde Park.)</p>
<p>She hasn't loved loved loved the core so much, although part of that was just bad luck with her Hum section I think. She has loved the people and the spirit of the university. At first, she envied her friends who were getting to take focused courses on topics that really interested them, but over time she has liked her experience more than most of them have liked theirs, and many (not all) of them feel that they have to hide their intellectual interests socially, while that is not at all a feature of my daughter's life, to say the least.</p>
<p>Sometimes she has regrets about not having chosen a more professional writing program. If she were starting over, she would probably look carefully at Carnegie-Mellon, Johns Hopkins, and Penn, none of which she really considered when she was in 12th grade. But that doesn't mean she would choose one of them over Chicago -- she would think about it more than she did. One of her creative writing teachers splits the year between Chicago and Columbia, and says the experience of teaching in the two colleges is very different. Many (not all) of the Chicago creative writing students are essentially hobbyists, and it is not that difficult to get into the classes. At Columbia, competition is fierce, and many of the students already have book deals.</p>
<p>Anyway, two more vignettes about her experience at Chicago:</p>
<p>She loved the multi-quarter history of drama course team-taught by a famous, senior Shakespearean scholar and the director of the University Theater. One of the cool aspects of the course was that, in lieu of papers, students could produce a scene from a play. She did that -- once -- with her very drama-oriented friends. She didn't do it again, because it was three times as much work as writing a paper. But the drama kids were in heaven (and killing themselves, repeatedly, doing super-professional productions).</p>
<p>Basically, anyone who wants to produce/direct a play and who can put together a decent proposal can get university resources to do it. But there aren't so many people who are into theater that you are guaranteed to get a good cast and crew. It takes a lot of work, and some luck, to round up the necessary ingredients. (At the Yale of my day, which was roughly the same size as Chicago, the volume of undergraduate theater was probably 2-3 times what it is at Chicago. There were just a lot more people who were into it.)</p>