<p>To me its a complex game that involves personality type, willingness to network, minors and related skills, etc. </p>
<p>take the following, for example:</p>
<p>An anthro major who takes accounting and econ, is very driven, and wants to work on wall street</p>
<p>An anthro major who is brilliant, studious, and wants to get a PhD and teach/research</p>
<p>An anthro major who is kinda nerdy, and is going to minor in comp sci, and hopes to work for the govt or an ngo combining the two fields, but if that fails, will go for a straight comp sci job</p>
<p>An anthro major who intends to go to law school, and has the will and the funding to make it happen</p>
<p>An anthro major without what it takes to go on to become a Phd anthropologist, who isnt really driven, and who doesnt have a fall back minor. Who is just hoping “something will turn up”</p>
<p>These are all people with different career prospects, wouldn’t you say? Enough to account for the difference between the Liberal arts majors who do fine, and the ones who become sad stories, eh? </p>
<p>It would be nice if it were as simple as “your major has no impact on your earnings prospects” or “Liberal arts is a straight ticket to poverty” cause then it would be much easier to give advice. But AFAICT neither is true.</p>