We only allowed our sons to take out Stafford loans. Both were a little under the max limit. We funded retirement first, both worked (albeit I was PT due to medical issues) paid COA out of current income, got some FA when our sons were in college concurrently, one S had scholarships equivalent to a year of COA. Only tapped into HELOC after I had a catastrophic medical event and was unable to work during our younger S’s last two years of school. That amount totalled a semester’s expenses. We were able to do this because we’d lived modestly for many years and DH was fortunate to have good, steady employment with medical coverage that kept os out of bankruptcy.
We took out PLUS loans for DH to attend grad school for tuition only, as I was working FT and paid our living expenses. We know what a big student loan payment looks like and how it affects life decisions. No way on this earth we would borrow $200k for UG or loan that kind of $$ to our sons.
If we were unable to foot the bill, our D would have gone to the regional university where she got a full ride. We would not have allowed her to take out loans, nor would we have been willing do so ourselves.
So, you are willing to pay for your daughter’s education but do not allow your daughter takes out the loan by herself. If you are unable to offer the top school expensive tuition, you just let your daughter go to inexpensive college. Is it correct?
We are a family who can not afford an expensive college and our son knows that. He is applying to in-state public schools and may need to take out some of the fed loans depending on whether he gets any financial or merit aid. We will pay out of current income for the rest (we do not have college savings due to a tougher time financially during the recession). We will not take out (or co-sign for) large loans for an expensive school. He will get a good education from one of our Cal State schools and that’s what matters to us and him. Thankfully, our family is not driven by prestige.
Actually it is common. I heard one family parents told their son to take out loans and pay back by employment after graduation whose son has been admitted to a top 30 private university with expensive tuition this coming Fall. The parents will pay only living expensese, however.
A kid can’t take out that debt without a co-signer. My co-worker learned that the hard way when her daughter defaulted on the loans and she’s now forced to repay them. My son is at a state school that we can afford; he will come out with mostly federal subsidized loans and a bit of unsubsidized, but under $20k total. D21 is higher stats but she is looking for merit and will either attend a state school (hoping for honors college if that route) or another school where she will get merit to get the cost to the state school range.
Agree with @thumper1 that one family’s story is not “common”. And, as has been mentioned before, a child cannot take out these large loans without a co-signer.
Both of my kids have the maximum amount of federal debt and we added some Parental Plus loan debt. I view the debt as simply easing my cashflow. Much like we borrow to buy a car, we borrowed for education.
Kids don’t pay the cost of attendance, parents do. Students can borrow small amounts (~$5k/year), but if there’s no merit or need based aid the rest has to come from the parents. If you can’t pay $200k then you can borrow it. You may know someone who’s borrowing that kind of money and thinks they’re going to have their kid repay it, but it doesn’t sound like you actually know any 22-year-olds who can afford to make $3k/month loan payments. You’re better off choosing a school you can actually afford.
There are some excellent state schools that are cheap for instate residents. There are expensive colleges that become inexpensive for students receiving merit aid. But I don’t think that’s your point. It seems to me you are making a mistake in equating expense with quality, which makes me think you don’t have a lot of exposure to the US higher education system, public or private.
I’ll try again. Your kids can’t get loans themselves to pay costs in excess of these amounts:
Freshman $5500
Sophomore $6500
Junior $7500
Senior $7500
That’s the limit of the federally funded loans your kids can take out themselves. More loans would either require the parent to take out the loans or to co-sign loans. The kids can NOT take out huge loans by themselves.
IIRC, you are asking about loans for $30,000 or more. That being the case, for freshman year! Parents would need to be on board with loans for about $25,000…kid by themselves can take $5500.
We did the same as the @thumper1 family plan - the kids all got decent merit where they attend (and in some cases places some would consider academically ‘below’ them) – there are 5 so… they took all their GSLs and we have managed the rest out of some 529 savings and current income. No huge loans for us or them.
@compiler Nobody can answer your question the way you are hoping to hear.
There have been many responses to your original thread about taking 200k+ loans.
You need to consider your own family finances and make a decision that you are comfortable with, whether that means Parent loans, or expecting the kid to pay back at a later time or go to an affordable school or hunt for merit aid.
Is your kid going to be competitive for HYPSM type or Top 10 ? Do you have good in-state options ? Will your kid be a NMF ? or competitive for merit aid ?
The point everyone is trying to make here, any loans will have to be taken by parents, as students are eligible only for 27K in federal student loans.
There may be some families that expect the student to pay them back later, or take care of them in old age or take loans with Home equity or 401k etc. but that is your OWN decision.
Of course, in such families, if the kid somehow dies, becomes disabled and unable to work, or can only get work with relatively low pay, the expected financial support from the kid to the parent will not occur.
@ucbalumnus with 5 kids this was our exact worry – they don’t finish, cannot get a job, have some other issue financial or otherwise and we are left holding the bag during old age. And with 5 the likelihood of at least one of them having said issues is increased so we were a no to big loans that we co-sign
I’m really curious as to whether this is a parent who wants their kid to go to a top 30 they can’t afford, or the kid who is looking for a way to go to a school his/her parents can’t afford (or won’t pay for, as it seems odd that there appears to be no need-based aid in the picture). Either way, as has been pointed out numerous times in this thread, the kid cannot take out most of the loans.