<p>A little background: </p>
<p>B.S. in biology from an Ivy League university
Cumulative Undergrad GPA ~2.9ish (have transcripts from 2 schools)
GRE 1520
Currently getting M.S. in biostatistics</p>
<p>Long story short, my undergrad GPA sucked. I transferred schools and my cumulative GPA is ~2.9 (3.9 from first school, 2.something low from the Ivy). I'm currently enrolled in a two year M.S. program (55 credits) in biostatistics at a state university. Needless to say, I'm now highly motivated and taking this dead serious. I plan on applying to a bunch of biostats PhD programs next year and was wondering how they will weight my masters performance. </p>
<p>If I demonstrate that I can excel in my rigorous courses (longitudinal analysis, categorical analysis, statistical theory, linear algebra, etc.), and also get stellar recommendations, will that compensate for my poor undergrad performance? I also have a 1520 GRE if that's relevant.</p>