<p>Im sorry for constantly posting questions like this I just need a lot of help. Pitt looks like theres more to do and more fun, but Rochester is pretty solid. Is it true that the Rochester girls are ugly?</p>
<p><em>blink, blink</em>...
Are you kidding?</p>
<p>Seriously, dude?</p>
<p>This is what you're basing your college choice on? Whether the girls at a particular college are ugly?</p>
<p>It's pretty much statistically impossible that all of the girls in a given locale are heinously disgusting. The question is whether or not the hotties that are at all worth holding a three-word conversation with will go out with a guy who bases his college decisions upon whether or not the female population is revolting.</p>
<p>You're not gonna like the answer to <em>that</em> question.</p>
<p>Back off, you dont have to answer the question. Maybe Ive narrowed it down so much to the point that I dont know what else to compare, Im only on this website to help make my decision. Youre the loser who has 1500 posts.</p>
<p>woah... calm down, both of you... </p>
<p>it was just a question, however sexist it is. Maybe it was just out of curiousity. Maybe. I'm not saying it's a good thing, but you (aibarr) should let him (mikedk90) ask his question. You didn't have to answer it and could have gone to a different thread and forgotten that you ever saw this thread.</p>
<p>Okay, should have used more winkies. Noted. Sometimes I lapse on whether I'm on CC or SA-Forums.</p>
<p>To <em>actually</em> answer your question, Rochester has a great music school, incidentally, and musicians have a high ratio of hotties.</p>
<p>Why is this in the engineering thread, though? I think that's the thing I have the greatest objection to. Are you really going to let engineers' taste (remember: pocket protectors... danger...) in women guide you in terms of where the tastiest cameraderie is? Sounds dangerous, to me.</p>