<p>72 and 102</p>
<p>I feel like a cold idiot.</p>
<p>Eep! 96 EQ (39th percentile... I'm socially inept!) and 145 IQ.</p>
<p>IQ- 120 Practical Wordsmith</p>
<p>Mwahaha. I'm practical. I probably would have done better if I wasn't listening to music, though.</p>
<p>Yea...online tests are BS</p>
<p>I got 147 on Mensa and a 139 on tickle.....</p>
<p>EQ
[quote]
Subscale IQ score = 106
Subscale percentile = 68
[/quote]
hah*ha* we're all socially retarded. on this thread i'm, like, normal to high. haha oh CC.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Narcissa, your IQ score is 147
Your overall intelligence quotient is the result of a scientifically-tested formula based on how many questions you answered correctly. But it's only part of what we learned about you from your answers on the test. We also determined the way you process information.</p>
<p>The way you think about things makes you a Visual Linguist. This means you are highly intelligent and have many diverse talents. You have especially strong linguistic talents and are very good at interpreting visual information. You've got your feet on the ground, but your mind is capable of very complex, abstract thought. Compared to others, you are easily able to see situations from many different angles. You also understand how things work in a very practical way. </p>
<p>How did we determine that your thinking style is that of a Visual Linguist? When we examined your test results further, we analyzed how you scored on 8 dimensions of intelligence: spatial, organizational, abstract reasoning, logical, mechanical, verbal, visual and numerical. The 3 dimensions you scored highest on combine to make you a Visual Linguist. Only 6 out of 1,000 people have this rare combination of abilities.</p>
<p>Find out which intelligence dimensions you scored highest on and how your IQ score compares to others in your personalized, 31-page Super IQ Report.
[/quote]
uh! sounds like a scam =)</p>
<p>Iq 147:</p>
<p>"The way you think about things makes you a Numerical Logician. This means that you're exceptionally strong in mathematics and at using logic to solve problems you have a way with numbers. But that's not all compared to others you're very detail-oriented, highly organized, and good at understanding things on a complex and abstract level. You're also a quick study when it comes to learning new things or understanding new concepts."</p>
<p>Eq 87:</p>
<p>"According to your self-report answers, your emotional intelligence is somewhat poor. People who score like you may at times feel that they have trouble dealing with their own emotions and those of others. They sometimes struggle to overcome difficulties in their lives and they are not always able to control their moods. It may be hard for them to understand how best to motivate themselves to overcome obstacles and reach their goals. In addition, they find social interactions difficult at times, for several reasons. They may have trouble allowing themselves to get close with others, finding it difficult to be vulnerable enough to establish intimacy or perhaps lacking understanding of, or comfort with, social interactions. Perhaps by working on your problem areas, you can become more confident in dealing with your own emotions and those of others."</p>
<p>Bahhhh. My EQ is 75. Maybe I should......be more emotional??!?!?!??!!</p>
<p>That was an emotionally inept thing to say.</p>
<p>We're talking to people on the interwebs. We are all socially retarded.</p>
<p>Emotional IQ:</p>
<p>"Snapshot Report
Self-report Component
Subscale IQ score = 65
Subscale percentile = 1"</p>
<p>is anyone surprised?</p>
<p>(and seriously, the questions were totally non-monofactorial. it would be MUCH more appropriate to dissect the score into several sections, as I can't read ppl's facial expressions - which obviously depressed my score). bah they want money</p>
<p>lmao 1th percentile. I'm 2nd percentile for height, 0th percentile for both weight and BMI :p</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>LOLLLLLLLL</p>
<p>My EQ is 55. I believe 0.16%th percentile. Are you surprised? :D</p>
<p>For those who wish to be informed:</p>
<p>The popular "IQ" tests located across the internet and perhaps even offered at school are NOT CORRECT METHODS TO CALCULATE INTELLIGENCE CAPACITY. Mensa is a joke, seriously. The test is beyond dependent on mathematics, which somehow has been the defining attribute of intelligence. Obvious flaws aside, intelligence capacity has nothing to do with LEARNED material. If you score 140 when you're six, you'll score 140 when you're 16. </p>
<p>If you want a your REAL intelligence quotient, see a PSYCHOANALYST. They will give you a proper estimate for you to make love with. </p>
<p>Rant:</p>
<p>IMO, this whole I.Q obsession is purely sourced from people's love of themselves. They're so insecure about their intelligence that they demand a population sanctioned-exam that shows everyone just how mentally able they are.</p>
<p>Honestly, don't hold on to your mensa result. It's a load of bologna. I scored a whopping 78, which for those who are unaware, makes me LEGALLY RETARDED. Meaning I could get a monthly disability check from our so charitable government. So, basically, I get paid for being stupid whilst you guys suffer in college debt with your 210 IQ.</p>
<p>Then again, I chose C for every question....XD</p>
<p>Nice, LOL, haha.</p>
<p>
[quote]
The popular "IQ" tests located across the internet and perhaps even offered at school are NOT CORRECT METHODS TO CALCULATE INTELLIGENCE CAPACITY.
[/quote]
the pattern IQ tests are hard. an IQ test asking you what a word means does NOT measure how smart you are, tho. and yes, whatever you score as a 3 year old is what you'll score as a 40 year old. i saw thing things on TV where a kid with a 130 IQ is being interviewed, and he's like 2. So? If i have anything remotely close to my "IQ," does that mean i shoudl be interveiwed too?</p>
<p>A clinical psychologist would also give you an IQ test. You can't estimate someone's IQ without a test. Actually, you can't estimate IQ at all.</p>
<p>i wonder if there is a correlation between high IQ, very low EQ, and a desire to homeschool oneself.</p>
<p>^SOMEONE probably can, cuz SOMEONE developed the term IQ in the first place. so that person can make someone's IQ whatever he/she wants to make it.</p>
<p>btw guys, check this out
Free</a> online iq test like the Mensa iq test.
it's a partial Mensa IQ test or something like that
so what do u get</p>
<p>But don't we love it when we score high?</p>
<p>Okay, well, you can't accurately estimate IQ.</p>
<p>And the Wechsler IQ test isn't solely based on patterns. In fact, I wouldn't even say that it's mostly based on patterns.</p>
<p>
[quote]
i wonder if there is a correlation between high IQ, very low EQ, and a desire to homeschool oneself.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>you'd have to control for laziness. btw welcome back</p>
<p>Snapshot Report
Self-report Component
Subscale IQ score = 55
Subscale percentile = 0.13 </p>
<p>55
According to your self-report answers, your emotional intelligence is very poor. People who score like you do feel that they have trouble dealing with their own emotions and those of others. They struggle to overcome difficulties in their lives and they are unable to control their moods. Its hard for them to understand how best to motivate themselves and reach their goals. In addition, they find social interactions quite difficult, for several reasons. They may have trouble allowing themselves to get close with others, finding it difficult to be vulnerable enough to establish intimacy. They also report having trouble offering support to others, likely due to the fact that they do not understand where others are coming from or they lack ideas about how best to help. Perhaps by working on your problem areas, you can become more confident in dealing with your own emotions and those of others.</p>