<p>I agree. </p>
<p>Peer assessments are quite valuable, IMO. They allow a school that has little to no control over the students it admits to improve their ranking by improving the quality of the school. When utilized correctly, peer assessments prevent the “tenured” ranking effect which often occurs with the objective ranking methodology (i.e. GPA, SAT scores, giving rate…) whereby elite schools will generally always admit high achieving students, forever securing their place in the rankings.</p>