<p>“Could the student have provided you with a brag sheet or CV that described her accomplishments (and perhaps what you noticed about her work) that would have given you the necessary information to write a good rec? Wouldn’t that have provided you the same information as the student writing a recc about herself in the third person?”</p>
<p>No. Those things wouldn’t have helped because to write a strong (with “strong” referring to being a detailed, specific one) recommendation, I needed specifics about things that the student had done in my class – papers written, things that I’d complimented the student on – and in activities that I advised. An overall CV wouldn’t have helped. The student would have remembered more about these things than I would have. Still, if a student had lied, I also would have realized that.</p>
<p>A few weeks ago, I was asked to write a recc for a former student whom I had last seen 10 years ago. She’s now applying to grad school after working in the interim. She drafted the recommendation for me, and I revised it. She had included a couple of things that I had forgotten (but that I remembered when I read them), and I included some things that she’d forgotten. The program that she was applying for differed from the subject that I had taught her, so I also needed her help drafting the letter because I didn’t know what might be information that I could convey that would be useful to that graduate program.</p>
<p>The people whom I have asked to draft their recommendations have been stellar students whom I had had a close relationship with. I knew that I could trust their honesty, and I also knew that they had done many things that impressed me: I just wanted to make sure that my recommendation included most of those things. I also used the drafts to help the students realize what their strengths were and how to write recommendation letters. I also always shared with them my final version of their recc letters. </p>
<p>Occasionally, I was asked to write reccs for students who were mediocre. I did not ask them to draft their reccs because I didn’t trust their judgment about what to write. Some were very bad writers, so I would have had to start from scratch in writing their reccs even if they drafted the recommendations. Some also had higher opinions of themselves than I had.</p>
<p>I would, though, let them know beforehand what I’d write so if they didn’t want me to write their recc, they could find someone else. For instance, a student who was one of the dimmest students whom I ever taught had struggled to get a “C” in my class, and had achieved that grade by doing extra credit.</p>
<p>I told him that I would put in his recc that he was personable, respectful, and a very hard worker who had managed to pass with a “C” a class that some of the top students in the department had to take over (In case you’re wondering, they had to take it over because they procrastinated and waited until the last minute to start writing their major papers, which was the bulk of their grades. While they had exceptional writing talent, it wasn’t possible to do a major research paper that met the course objectives at the last minute.)</p>
<p>Apparently what I wrote was good enough because he got into the graduate program and eventually got his doctorate from there. Based on his being able to get his doctorate from that program, however, I lost all respect for that university, but that’s another story. A graduate student from that university whom I met recently told me that her program accepted her application several months after the deadline, and allowed her recommendation letter to be written by one of her college friends, who like she, had graduated from college just the year before.</p>
<p>Back to recommendation ethics: What wouldn’t be ethical would be for a professor to have a student write their own recommendation letter, sign it as if they were the professor, and then mail it. That would be fraudulent. Drafting a letter and then giving it to the recommender to revise, however, isn’t fraudulent because the recommender could make any revisions they deemed necessary.</p>