<p>
[quote]
Not all Privates are the same. An undergrad-focused Brown or Dartmouth or Williams vs. a Grad focused Harvard or Stanford (just look at the number of students undergrad vs. grad at each school).
[/quote]
</p>
<p>If you're going to say "Not all privates are the same," I think it'd be better to follow up with a contrast between tippy top private vs. not-so-high top private. So Brown or Williams or Stanford vs. University of Miami or U Rochester.</p>
<p>The difference in undergraduate education among those you mentioned is really negligible. You can't measure whether a school is more focused on one or the other by the # undergrads vs. the # grads. Berkeley has 2x the number of undergrads as the number of grads. Is it more undergrad-focused than Harvard (which has roughly 2x the number of grads as undergrads)? It's possible for a school to be "focused" on neither and provide a top undergrad and a top grad. I think Stanford, Princeton, Yale, and probably Harvard as well (despite the complaints) do this. Having a top grad division doesn't mean that its undergrad is inferior to Dartmouth's, Brown's, etc.</p>