<p>Hi,
I would like to ask question about your guide. If I can memorize all grammar rules faster with making short summaries should I make them? Or it's futile?
Thanks.</p>
<p>You’ve been procrastinating and lazy when it comes to English your entire life, according to our MSN conversations. Shouldn’t you be working hard to make up for that now?</p>
<p>^lol do you have MSN? If so, may I add you?</p>
<p>^
He posted wrong not “MSN” - “private messages”.</p>
<p>^Eh, stop trifling over which means of messaging Mikethechimp used… Aren’t we enough with your ■■■■■■■■ already…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Are you silverturtle’s? What the hell you are doing here? You gave you right to post in my topic? Get out from here. Go to kidgarden. it’s the best place to be for you. Get away from me.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yeah benhpark, are you in the possession of Silverturtle?!</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yea benhpark, you gave yourself the right to post in this thread. You son of a *****.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yea benhpark, go to a garden where they harvest kids. That’ll show ya.</p>
<p>^Suleyman95 was referring back to Mikethechimp FYI; he took the excerpt from Mikethechimp and I am perplexed why I am targeted by a mocking diatribe of yours.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The first sentence is wordy; it could have been rephrased as …do you possess Silverturtle?!
The third has an ambiguous pronoun that shows no clear antecedent. To whom is they referring?
Why don’t you take a linguistics class? You seem to suffer from grammatical mistakes.</p>
<p>And to answer your questions, I have nothing involved except that I was soliciting Mikethechimp’s MSN, and to dismiss Suleyman’s trivial claim that Mikethechimp pointed his laziness via private messaging, not via Windows Messenger.</p>
<p>All CC-ers only posted “wasting time” posts and no one spend even second to help me except benpark.</p>
<p>^To be precise, I was not really helping you either. All I sent you was a summary of tips from CC, and that summary was already posted here.</p>
<p>Others even one word didn’t say.+100 wr questions are great.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Because you’re asking this question, I gather that summarizing content after learning it is helpful for you;so I would say yes.</p>
<p>Suleyman, wteff man? I have came to the conclusion, after reading your posts, that your IQ is no higher than 50, which people call mentally ■■■■■■■■.</p>
<p>your is -50</p>
<p>like monkey have hahaha</p>
<p>Suleyman is an absolute disgrace to all fobs who ■■■■■ and envisages to ■■■■■; and since fobs who ■■■■■ and envisages to ■■■■■ are the worst of all ■■■■■■, logic declares that Suleyman is not a ■■■■■ at all, but an impudent nuisance who impregnates the titular College Confidential forums (specifically the SAT Preparation division) with petulance and repulsive Engrishism. </p>
<p>Furthermore, Suleyman has brought blatant ignominy to our beloved Dr. Silverturtle. Suleyman’s inquiry and trollation to His name is axiomatic manifestation of such derision. Not only so, but this man, if we shall call him a man, dares to even contemplate of paraphrasing the sacred text that which is Dr. Silverturtle’s. </p>
<p>Ostensibly, Suleyman does not have the right to employ the term we coined: “Dr. Silverturtle”. This insubordinate fob (if even worthy of that appellation) has disrespected Dr. Silverturtle, our love and creator of salvation.</p>