<p>I felt duty bound to respond to this thread, being both from the UK and a current USC grad student. To give some background, I did my undergrad at Cambridge and my Masters at Brown. I would put USC alongside either of them, if I am being honest, although it certainly has different strengths and weaknesses. That being said, with the pace of change, the ambition of the schools certainly goes 1.USC, 2.Brown, 3.Cambridge. I am sure you know about the difficulties of UK universities at the moment, but USC’s ambition is staggering (beyond the headline-grabbing donations). To give you an example- I know the social sciences best, but I am sure examples abound from other fields- economics was hiring 10 new professors last year. 10. In the worst job market higher education has ever seen. UCLA, UCSD and (to a slightly lesser extent, but still visibly) Berkeley are losing faculty due to delayed promotion, attrition without replacement, pension pots filling and profs looking elsewhere etc. Obviously, they’ve put fees up by 33% to try and stem the tide, but the California public university system is in a mess. I say this with no triumphalism, I think California’s public education system played a huge role in the state’s development and it should be something that California residents still take great pride in. But USC, Stanford and Cal Tech are making hay. And it isn’t just the Cal system that is being raided- big name professors have come from all over the place: Damasio came from Iowa (and does loads of talks on campus, which is fascinating), Castells from Cal, we’ve just stolen two prominent Oxford philosophers (as well as a collaborator from Arizona), Lord Eatwell has come over from Cambridge etc etc</p>
<p>I have had friends at Harvard (they had TAs and little professor interaction), Brown (my fellow grad students TA’d), Stanford (ditto), Cal (ditto), UT Austin (huge classes and TAs). In reality, every school has TAs. But USC’s professors are much, much better than most I’ve seen in wanting to play a much more hands-on role with the development of undergrads. The amount of supervised honors theses, the length of office hours, the letters of rec, supervised programs like TIRP, talks on campus, prof-connected clubs and societies etc etc. CIS has huge numbers of talks, in an intimate setting, on public affairs; the Unruh Institute combines student and visiting speakers on pressing domestic issues; The Energy Institute on campus is doing some really exciting work with students from all fields including field trips, visiting speakers, conferences. The US-China Institute, The Korean Studies Institute, the Philosophy Society has some great talks. Obviously drama on campus is pretty superb (the only place better I’ve seen was Cambridge, but we didn’t have as good facilities). And then, during courses, I taught one intro course last year where the prof knew everyone’s name (it had 250 students), sat in on TA’s discussion sections, had approx. 6 hours of office hours every week, emailed students he hadn’t seen recently, re-graded everything we graded to ensure fairness, had an extra-curricular, extra-credit quiz competition etc etc. Ask any TA from any other school and they will tell you that I am making this up!</p>
<p>In short, there is every single way that a talented student will be stretched at USC in a way that at a lot of other schools they’ll be lost in the shuffle. I know every school says that, but that’s been my experience, for what it’s worth. Obviously, like everything, it is as much about the student as it is about the school, but if the student wants to push him/herself, they’ll be greated enthusiastically!</p>
<p>Lastly, on Greek Life. It’s obviously there, and some people speak very highly of it, but the vast majority of my students are not in a frat or a sorority and some of the ones who are are extremely able. It’s certainly not Animal House or anything, indeed far from it. To be honest, as there is so much to do on campus and in the city, it’s nigh on impossible for the Greeks to dominate anything. Sorry Greek people!</p>
<p>And, if we are looking at party schools, Cambridge would probably have beaten Arizona State or whoever is most notorious. You put a bar in every college, you don’t insist on continuous assessment like they do at USC, instead giving exams at the end of the year, and you’ll get a lot of undergrad drinking! USC is far, far tamer than Cambridge ever was! </p>
<p>The other thing, which I think is important but others think less so, is the campus experience. Football games, tailgating, sports facilities, on-campus drama, recreational sports, clubs and societies etc are all very important aspects of the undergrad experience. I think Brown students missed out on that. I really do. As long as you get great academics and proper attention at a bigger school (like at a USC, Duke, Stanford), then I feel you miss out by not having that technicolor university experience. I go as a grad student because I felt I missed out as an undergrad. I wish I had had the opportunity. Makes for a great feeling of togetherness (family, if you will) and a really close Alumni network, which is as important as your degree in many ways moving forward.</p>
<p>Anyway, I am prattling on at this point. Let me know if I can answer any questions.</p>