<p>Although the candidate promised both to cut taxes and improve services, he failed to keep either of them after the election.</p>
<p>(A) Although the candidate promised both to cut taxes and improve services, he
(B) The candidate, having promised both to cut taxes and improve services
(C) Although the candidate made promises both to cut taxes and improve services, he
(D) Having promised, first, to cut taxes and, second, to improve services, the candidate
(E) The candidate's promises were both to cut taxes and improve services, he</p>
<p>Answer: A</p>
<p>Now, here's my problem: I thought when you used "both" and "and", there had to be parallelism. For example, wouldn't that sentence be right as:</p>
<p>Although the candidate promised both TO cut and TO improve services, he failed to keep either of them after winning the election. The correct answer doesn't have that parallelism, so why is it right? same with "and" questions. if im using "and", should there ALWAYS be parallel structure (e.g - we got degrees IN this and IN that)</p>
<p>A seems wrong to me. ----failed to keep either of them--this must refer to promises =them, but C and E are wrong too because of the parallelism you mention. Better: Although the candidate made promises to cut taxes and to improve....,he</p>
<p>I never pay attention to parallelism and still get around perfect score for the writing section. I actually figured out i score better when im really tired and not so picky about small things. Don't think so complicated.. :)</p>
<p>in A, 'them' refers to nothing because 'promised' is in verb form! In C, 'promises' is the noun that 'them' refers to. Does anyone agree? Unless this question comes from a real SAT, I think the editors may have made a mistake here in saying A is correct...</p>
<p>A can't be the answer...the them can't refer to the verb clause, it needs a noun</p>
<p>Ugh, though I hate these "both" questions. I know it's simple parallelism with that, but I can't stand it when it isn't clear. Like the OP, I wanted to see </p>
<p>"Although the candidate promised both TO cut and TO improve services..."</p>
<p>Why can the second to be omitted in standard written english? It sounds just off to me without it.</p>