@Ali1302
“I think I now know why your insistent to sticking to your obviously ignorant and false position on IQ. Also the fact that you label a lot of studies that prove the environment along with other socioeconomic factors effect IQ. Wealth would probably be a much stronger correlation than simply taking into account income since the cost of living isn’t factored in here.”
I’ve read all of them and I refer to them as Mickey Mouse studies because they lack rigor and comprehensiveness. I know this is hard for you to believe because you are still a high school student, but just because some guy has a PhD doesn’t mean he knows what he’s talking about. A sociologist and a psychologist should have no business explaining econometric models or even attempting a study that requires something more complicated than univariate analysis.
The unfortunate issue is that most people in this planet lack the education and intelligence to comprehend this problem, and so they take the intellectually lazy path of believing whoever has the most degrees, which then results in people supporting misguided policies like Affirmative Action when there isn’t really a problem to be solved.
Based on IQ models, the current racial composition in higher ed and STEM/high-paying fields is to be expected.
I have never denied a strong correlation between IQ/SAT scores and income. I have only argued that genetic plays the biggest role, with environment playing no role (Or at best, a very minuscule role). My beliefs are backed my twin adoption studies. The similarities between twins born in vastly differing environment don’t end with just intelligence. Height, voice, hand-writing, interests, occupations, quirks, and everything else are similar. You really have no idea just how powerful genetics is. In one case, both of the twins who have never seen each other love washing their hands until they are red. One of the twins said that he does it because his step mother taught him to be clean, while the other said that he does it because he didn’t want to turn into a slob like his step mother.
Ironically, it is our genes that cause us to think the environment influenced us when we would have turned out the same regardless of where we grew up.
“Anyway, because your Asian you hold a personal grudge against others who argue against your model and feel that you and your fellow Asians are the most entitled based on IQ alone. This is obviously false since differences in test scores between whites and Asians are very trivial. The fact that you believe most Asians like you don’t try hard is laughable. Most Asians lock themselves up in their rooms studying for months for tests, constantly doing their homework and working “hard”. Or were your parent any different in emphasizing “hard work”? Have you heard of tiger parenting where it is normal for parents to abuse their kids for higher academic performance? This is very common amongst Asian families.”
This is laughably off-point. First off, I don’t have a problem with affirmative action at elite colleges. Private institutions can do whatever they want, and I also personally believe that Asians should stop complaining. Based on the Founding Fathers, Asians and other non-whites were not even supposed to be welcome to the US. You can read excerpts from the Founding Fathers who were clear as day that the US was supposed to be for whites and whites only.
Ever since 1965, when the laxer immigration laws have been passed, the massive influx of Asians have diluted the US labor market and have caused white American wages to stagnate and decline. Look up wage statistics going all the way back to the early 1900s. Americans were enjoying YoY wage increases until 1965, where it started stagnating before going down a few decades after. Coincidence?
Currently, wages for a typical American are so bad the media had to resort to average wage to suppress any indication of a disappearing middle class.
Today, 50% of working Americans (This excludes children, NEET, and retirees) make less than $28,000/year.
Asians have harmed the living standards of Americans, and now they want to leech the institutions that whites have built. If Asians have their way and become 50+% of Harvard, the whites would move and build up some other college, where then Asians would reject Harvard and follow the whites. It’s a one-sided parasitic relationship that is morally reprehensible.
I personally believe it is best if there is no immigration to any country. Asians, as well as other non-whites, should solve their own problems instead of dragging the west down with them.
Don’t dare try to claim my Asian ethnicity is causing my emotions to guide my beliefs. I say this as humbly as possible: I am one of the most unbiased people in the world. What I say and what I believe in are guided by my understanding of facts, even if they may oppose my interests.
Likewise for this topic, I am criticizing the pro-affirmative action arguments because they lack solid evidence, not because I have an emotional or financial stake in the argument. I am viewing the issue as a statistician, not as a social justice warrior. If you lot were honest that you want affirmative action to admit some races with significantly lower test scores, then I wouldn’t even be in the discussion. It’s only because your side blatantly tries to lie about it by claiming that all races admitted have the same stats that I enter the argument.
As for the rest of your post, it sounds like a broken record. We’ve been through this over and over for the past 1 and a half pages.
After accounting for IQ, income, wealth, and any other socioeconomic factors become statistically insignificant in predicting SAT scores. It doesn’t matter if you link me 1 million studies that don’t factor in IQ, because that would make every single one of those million studies junk. You are in no position, educationally, to decide which studies are good or bad. You don’t have the proper training or tools to decide that, so why should any of us take you seriously?