<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>These statements are quoted for disagreement. First of all, the federal definition of which people belong to the American Indian or Alaska Native race category includes the requirement that those persons maintain tribal affiliation or community attachment to other persons of that race. Genetic ancestry is not the whole story in defining who is of the Native American or Alaska Native race category. </p>
<p>Second, it is by no means certain that a blood test or DNA test of any kind can reliably identify who has ancestors who may have been American Indian or Alaska Native persons. I did the expected Google search to look up information on this subject. </p>
<p>A New York Times article </p>
<p><a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/12/us/12genes.html[/url]”>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/12/us/12genes.html</a> </p>
<p>from 2006 reports </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>A 2007 article, “Genetic “Markers”–Not a Valid Test of Native Identity,” </p>
<p>[Genetic</a> “Markers”- Not a Valid Test of Native Identity](<a href=“http://www.ipcb.org/publications/briefing_papers/files/identity.html]Genetic”>Genetic "Markers"- Not a Valid Test of Native Identity) </p>
<p>from the Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism points out that purported genetic tests to show American Indian or Alaska Native ancestry can yield both false positive and false negative results, a fact inherent in the nature of discrete genetic inheritance from multiple ancestors and random mutation. The Wikipedia article on the general subject </p>
<p>[Genealogical</a> DNA test - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogical_DNA_test]Genealogical”>Genealogical DNA test - Wikipedia) </p>
<p>provides some more details. </p>
<p>Kim TallBear noted in a 2003 article </p>
<p>[Can</a> DNA determine who is American Indian? - Indian Country Today (Lakota Times) | Encyclopedia.com](<a href=“http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P1-89108712.html]Can”>http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P1-89108712.html) </p>
<p>reposted elsewhere online </p>
<p>[Can</a> DNA Determine Indian Ancestry?](<a href=“http://www.manataka.org/page267.html]Can”>http://www.manataka.org/page267.html) </p>
<p>that </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Many tribal authorities display a healthy skepticism about such claims regarding genetic tests, but that skepticism is not always matched by the general public–and it’s unclear what college admission offices do with such claims. </p>
<p>A webpage that appears to be from a company in the business of DNA testing </p>
<p><a href=“http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-facts-about-dna-testing-and-enrollment.pdf[/url]”>http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-facts-about-dna-testing-and-enrollment.pdf</a> </p>
<p>acknowledges </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Researchers specializing in bioethics and anthropology </p>
<p>[Identity</a> and genetic ancestry tracing](<a href=“http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC139044/?tool=pubmed]Identity”>Identity and genetic ancestry tracing - PMC) </p>
<p>point out </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Again, what is convincing to a college admission office may not have any basis in either science or the law. It’s not clear how strictly college admission office consideration of self-reported Native American race matches the federal regulations or the latest genetic or anthropological research. Each college applicant is welcome to self-report any fact about the applicant that may show the applicant adds to the diversity and quality of a college class. Each college, within broad legal limits, gets to decide what diversity and other factors make a difference in admission decisions. But it is very unlikely that colleges can, or do, rely solely on mail-order blood tests to make crucial admission decisions at the margin.</p>