<p>I've been reading threads for a while, and posting around for a little while less, but from everything I've seen, I think I might have had a less-than-stellar interview, possibly with a less-than-stellar interviewer.</p>
<p>Given what I've read from nearly everyone here, their interviews were conducted by people who were kind, sociable, understanding, and truly curious about what their interviewees had to offer. They asked probing questions, and made honest attempts to really get to know the person they were interviewing. Everyone who has been interviewed seems to have treated fairly, and been given ample leeway in where they had the interview and what they talked about. They were accommodated to feel comfortable, and really got to know their interviewers as well as their interviewers got to know them; there was an actual personal connection (at the very least attempted to be) forged.</p>
<p>I did not feel like I got that. Luck of the draw, I suppose, or maybe it was a front to see how I fared under pressure, or maybe it was really just a bad time for him for reason that are none of my business, but I cannot say I came away from my interview feeling as radiant as many of you have had the fortune to.</p>
<p>My interviewer demanded a one-page list of accomplishments off the bat, and sent me his specific time and place first reply, with no impetus or hint of "what's good for you?": Columbus Day, 8PM, his apartment. OK then, I guess. After my e-mailed list accidentally vanished off the face of the earth (another story), he called peeved the afternoon before wondering if the interview was even going to happen. That gets smoothed over after profuse apology and over-the-phone snubbing, and the next night I go in internally sweating bullets; I was never given any impetus to stop worrying. While the interview went alright, he seemed very distant, perhaps even laboring to remain stony-faced; I could barely tell when things were going well, and when they weren't. He seemed almost apathetic, as if I was burdening him with my presence, only perking up when telling me the tales of his own experiences at MIT. I tried to be as enthusiastic as I normally am about my accomplishments and hobbies, but I did not feel like I was getting any real interest back. The interview ended on a strange note as well; he seemed extremely skeptical of why I was applying Early Action, as if that was some kind of cardinal sin, and try as I might to explain things, he seemed locked in that my school was putting me up to it, or that my motivations were not "pure". </p>
<p>I can't really say I had a bad interview; I just have no idea what to think. Any input?</p>