<p>Why I feel entitled to comment: Hi, I'm a primary grade teacher whose been watching spelling patterns in the high school set, lately. Also, note that my brother, sister-in-law attended Deis; their S just get in ED-II. </p>
<p>I know I tend to be a cheering squad for students (my positive nature) and I don't want to give anyone "false hope" as Paul Simon says.</p>
<p>Still, unlike another poster above, I had a very favorable intutive response to your chances. I'll give you the bad news first, then the good, which is how my own kids prefer to hear things :)</p>
<p>Where to improve:</p>
<p>Let's start with stats. Yours are all between 620-680 although you didn't want to mention anything but the chem SAT-II. Waiting on lit..well, that IS one of the hardest, but it could be fine, I hope so. </p>
<p>STILL, because you are so accomplished musically as evidenced by your EC's (see the good news, below) you present something excellent, a hook, that the adcoms can seize upon to admit you if they like everything about you except the SAT's. Besides, Brandeis like all places has a RANGE of SAT scores. You might be on the low end of their median range, or even below it. But, hey, don't you ever wonder HOW someone gets admitted who has scores below the range? YOU"RE HOW. (again, see the "good news" re: music EC below). </p>
<p>I didn't catch whether you're a jr. or a senior. IF you're a sr, the die is cast (get the pun?). But if a jr., you definitely (note my spelling; half the posters on CC write the incorrect: definately...) have a GREAT chance to spend a day of spring break finding yourself some SAT prep books AND stop at a bookstore or Amazon.com to find yourself some of those books about spelling. We used to use "l000 words most commonly misSpelled" but there's probably better stuff on the market. </p>
<p>Since you asked, I saw these 2 misspells:
It's not rigerous but RIGOROUS (think of similar words: humor, rigor)
It's not "competative" but COMPETITIVE (think of competition, rather than how it sounds..)</p>
<p>And since I'm an early elementary educator, I can't resist analyzing this professionally (I won't charge you for this): You seem to have good spelling
strategy of looking for resources (my guess is you swept the names of all your EC's because they are perfect, OR you've seen them spelled correctly in published materials often enough that you've internalized the correct spelling. Either way is okay. We teach kids to look for correctly spelled words on book covers, posters, and anything published around them in the classroom, if they're unsure how to spell something.). But your spelling breaks down when it is a multi-syllable word with a root that changes due to grammar (for example, moving from "compete" to "Competititve" broke down your accuracy, similarly from "rigor" (which I bet you'd get correct if only the 5 letters) to "rigorous" nailed you. And you didn't notice those inaccuracies even when you reread your post (at another poster's blunt prompting...). SO, now you know one "Achillles' heel" (wikkipedia now if you must). Be especially alert whenever you write a word of 3 syllables or more that changes form (compete to competitive), espec. if it causes YOU any hesitation as you begin to write the tricky word. If you hesitated, you probably sense there's an inaccuracy looming (so you have good intuition). So, you need to watch out and check all of those because they're tricky (to you and others! you're not alone).
When you use the spell-check on computer, take a moment to linger and analyze the correction, don't just push "Change." Learn from your errors, don't just rush forward.
Finally, you are obviously an "AUDIAL LEARNER" (look at all that music!). Learners are either (or sometimes 2 of the following): visual, audial, kinesthetic/sensory. Visual learners can read a book and see the word spelled correctly, then internalize it. Audial learners do great hearing the spoken word (directions, lectures...) but don't always retain the spelling, even when they see it in them in a book or on spell-check, the next time they need it. Kinesthetic/sensory learners (the kind who memorize their town by driving it, always could fix the pencil sharpeners in the classrooms, love tools and dance well...) retain corrected spelling best if they WRITE it down (keep a journal by your computer for 6 months, see if it helps). They internalize lessons once their body has participated in it (other than the eyes--visual--and ears--audial--learners' best body parts).</p>
<p>OK, so it never helps to wither people over their spelling. OF COURSE, you'll get your app proofread, but I'm offering these to improve your spelling at the root cause. STILL, get your app proofread. EVERYBODY should and will.</p>
<p>NOW, on to the GOOD NEWS:
You have done what everyone wants to see in EC's. You have followed your passion and developed it to the high level,including leadership and originality. It expresses itself personally ("wrote song", won award so you must be good) and communally (band, symphony). You enjoy classical as well as jazz, so you're open to many ideas. You've pursued and devloped it over YEARS. This is not just your lame "club membership."
I know someone just admitted to 'Deis ED-II who made his jazz and marching band work the centerpiece of his application. It was also the source of some of his essays and short answers, different aspects about what it means to him. For example, he started a jazz band at his school which showed some leadership; he wrote about how he FELT leading the marching band to show he could be "in the moment." He wrote about some other things, too, but mostly his (demonstrated!) passion for music was the springboard throughout his app to reveal his soul, er.."personality" to the committee. Again, he did also write about some other things, but often used the music to take off.<br>
His stats were only slightly higher than yours, in one or two places, and identical in others. You are not trying to impress them as a future scientist, I'm guessing, although anything is possible for those who can excel in music. But at the moment, you have a "hook" which is the one thing that can help offset SAT's that are "nothing to write home about." Yours are weak-ISH for Brandeis, but they're not in the sewers either! None are in the 500's, at least not what you put onto CC. And if you're a jr., there's still time to improve them. Another 30 or 40 points would really make a remarkable presentation because you still have the "hook." If you could get something, just one above a 700 somewhere, that might be nice. But don't kill yourself (or quit band) trying, either. Just try. Take SAT course, use the home and online SAT prep materials, etc. If you end up with the same scores, then those represent you truly..and honestly they are good enough to do college level work. you'v demonstrated your work ethic already (through band and a steady GPA) so I'd presume you'd work and study hard at college whenever you need to.</p>
<p>You have good recs, probably a good personality, great EC's. Brandeis needs to know you can achieve academically, and I'd venture to say that SAT's in the 600's demonstrate that. You have a fabulous "hook" that they can make use of on campus. </p>
<p>(I am sorry if this is long; kept getting interrupted as all Moms do..will send now.) BEST WISHES. </p>
<p>PS, you mention Jewish male from Connecticut. Not that it's required, but do you also have an expression of Jewish activity, identity or direction? That would be interesting to note on your app, IF it's authentic to you. I don't mean you had a bar mitzvah. Do you have a CURRENT relationship with Jewish materials, attend services on your own initiative to explore what's there for you (not your parents) now? Would it be something you'd like to do while at Brandeis, where you can explore Jewish practice in 37 different flavors if you so choose,,, even if you're just curious to explore it during your college years, Brandeis offers more choices within Judaism than any other college or uni. If you have even a glimmer of curiosity to develop your Jewish understanding, through courses, participation in events or services, etc. then mention it. As long as Brandeis is admitting a Jewish male from CT from a competitive h.s., wouldn't it be nice if he also brought something to the table int terms of participation or curiosity in one of their strongest, most unique offerings for undergrads? So, if you identify, represent! If not, don't fake it. If you might be curious, however, perhaps it can fit into a "Why Brandeis" essay if they ask that kind of thing.</p>