“Moreover, ask an Ivy admissions officer if they are similar to the 5C’s or Amherst or Swarthmore and they will say, “there is no similarity” in the experiences they provide.”
No, they wouldn’t. I drew these statements from actual statements mentioned in official admissions websites.
“Brown, whose history reaches back more than two centuries, maintains a university-college of liberal arts, offering many of the advantages of both the small college and the large university.”
“One of the world’s premier liberal arts colleges and distinguished by a singular, intensive Core Curriculum, Columbia College provides all the benefits of a small college and all the reach of a great research university.”
“Liberal Arts College and Research University: Embrace “And”. Yale is best defined by the word and. Yale is both a research university and a liberal arts college. All Yale undergraduates enroll in a single liberal arts college with nearly 2,000 undergraduate courses and 75 majors available.”
“Princeton is a major research institution with the heart and soul of a liberal arts college.”
UChicago: “Drawing on the powerful combination of a traditional liberal arts college at the heart of a premier research university, students have almost unlimited options”
The mere fact that these schools refer to the small, traditional liberal arts college means that they acknowledge some depth of similarity, not none whatsoever.
You are entitled to your view that the LACs and LA-emphasizing universities are mutually incompatible with one another, and that it’s absurd for someone considering Amherst or Pomona to be looking at Columbia or Harvard (as you stated in another thread). But I disagree with this premise. I think on the whole they have a lot in common with each other. I can’t speak for everyone, but I felt perfectly comfortable at Yale, Princeton, and Brown, where I stayed for 2-3 days for conferences over my time at Pomona and was hosted by a current student. Brown especially- their students were so similar to people I knew at Pomona that it was a bit startling. But at the end of the day, I left with a greater appreciation for having gone to Pomona. I didn’t feel any envy, just a realization that there were many different sort of experiences that could have been which might have influenced me a little bit differently than Pomona did. And also fundamental experiences and similarities that would have resonated with me across these institutions. But that goes without saying.