<p>^I have no idea what you are trying to say about the interview thing.</p>
<p>Edit: I wasted my 600th post on that. sad :(</p>
<p>Schadenfreude is a German word that is that feeling you get when something not so nice happens to someone you donāt really like. We donāt have an English word for it, but we should.</p>
<p>Yes, I looked that up, but what you were saying still makes no sense. </p>
<p>EDIT: I looked back over it, and maybe I get it. Are the first sentence and the last two seperate ideas that really shouldnāt be linked? So, in the first sentence, you were saying that my friends and I enjoyed seeing the guy get waitlisted. Then, in the next sentence, you said that yes, interviews do probably weed out students like the one I mentioned. And in the third sentence, you were saying that an interview is numeric and not likely to destroy oneās chances. Am I reading what you wrote correctly?</p>
<p>I posted on the wrong thread. There was another Georgetown thread that talked about the endowment. Sorry about that.</p>
<p>huh? Now I am thoroughly confused :)</p>
<p>Okay, now I understand what you are asking. āAlthough,ā indicated contrast to meāitās late. So, I do think that the interviews eliminate some of the ācomplete boresā as you described your acquaintance. However, my daughter was told in her interview that it was numeric. I would imagine that an interviewer does have some room for judgment even after a numeric chart is completed.</p>