<p>tiyusufaly posted on another thread: </p>
<p>"Something I feel I should mention with regards to "research opportunities" at LACs:</p>
<p>Simply put, it's hard for an undergraduate to make serious, hardcore, extremely useful contributions to research in math and science. For any undergraduate, anywhere, especially in my opinion in math and physics, but also in biology and chemistry.</p>
<p>The reason for this is that math and science are very advanced, and require a lot of training and coursework to get to the level of truly understanding the current, cutting edge research literature. In physics, to name one example, you usually need to have advanced understanding of graduate electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, oftentimes classical and quantum field theory. And then you have to learn all about the advanced details of the topic of your sub-specialty. Simply put, it's HARD for most undergrads to gain a level of background in mathematics and science to really seriously contribute at the level that graduate students or postdocs do. This is to be expected of course.</p>
<p>But the reason I am bringing it up is because I think it is for this reason that, for undergraduate at least, the breadth and depth and type of research that is offered is not so important. What is more important in my opinion is that you have good role model faculty members and student peers who can help you build up your bag of tools and skill set. To be a good graduate student and overall researcher, you should understand how to perform experiments, how to program and code, how to write and communicate (VERY IMPORTANT!!), and most importantly, HOW TO LEARN NEW THINGS INDEPENDENTLY! There will always be new things to learn when one is doing research, such as different programming languages, various experimental techniques, conceptual theories, etc... You have to have the ability to figure things out for yourself.</p>
<p>Most high school students, when they first start college, do not really understand what true serious research is like and how it is conducted (I know this, my professors have told me of their experience with undergrads). It is therefore important that you have people who will look over you, and slowly, carefully wean you and polish your skills. That way, with proper care and attention, by the time you have graduated, your abilities and understanding of how science and math are really done has matured to the appropriate level.</p>
<p>The importance of understanding how to do research cannot be underestimated. Without this understanding, it really doesn't mean that much if you have so many different professors working on so many different problems and projects. You have to develop the skill set and the knowledge base to be able to maturely, independently, productively contribute to such a research project. Which brings me back to my initial point, that one should not really worry too much about certain state schools or universities having more cutting edge research than LACs. While you are still an undergrad, it is more important that you have some research there period, and that you have people who help you develop your research abilities. That way, by the time you are a graduate student, you can really, successfully contribute to those cutting edge groups at the larger schools. I think LACs in general do a better job of helping this personal development along, and I think that's why so many LAC alumni can successfully complete Ph.D's."</p>
<p>What do you think about this?</p>