<p>In my previous thread I asked everyone to rank the Ivy League and Pseudo-Ivy League based on prestige. I have compiled the results from more than 20 different responses in order to present a clear list. </p>
<p>To prevent any confusion, I should clarify that the number to the right of the hyphen simply represents the school's average ranking. A university can have an average rank of 6.8 and still be ranked number 3. If you are confused by this clarification, please post something and I will do my best to explain my methodology.</p>
<p>The list is:</p>
<h1>1: Harvard - 1.05 (with the exception of rtgrove (a kid obsessed with Princeton), the decision was unanimous)</h1>
<h1>2: Yale - 3.05</h1>
<h1>3: Stanford - 3.45</h1>
<h1>4: Princeton - 3.5</h1>
<h1>5: MIT - 4.4</h1>
<h1>6: Columbia - 7.0</h1>
<h1>7: UPenn - 8.25</h1>
<h1>8: Cal Tech - 8.35</h1>
<h1>9: Brown - 8.72</h1>
<h1>10: Dartmouth - 10.44</h1>
<h1>11: University of Chicago - 11.11</h1>
<h1>12: Cornell - 11.55</h1>
<h1>13: Duke - 12.0</h1>
<h1>14: Northwestern - 13.625</h1>
<h1>15: Johns Hopkins - 14.75</h1>
<h1>16: Washington University at Saint Louis - 16.0</h1>
<h1>17: NYU - 17.15 (this value is distorted because if I hadn't told people to rank it, it wouldn't have made the list).</h1>
<p>???: Berkley - Not enough values (my apologies for not including it in the list).</p>
<p>I suggest making an Excell column graph (with university name in descending order on the x-axis and average ranking on the y-axis), it really pronounces the differences. The trends are very interesting. If you graph it, then you can really see some distinct "tiers."</p>
<p>Post your thoughts.</p>