Reuters: Students and teachers detail pervasive cheating in a program owned by test giant ACT

From Pulitzer winner Steve Stecklow:

http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/college-cheating-act/

WAY worse than I’d ever imagined. WAY worse than Reuters’ discoveries about SAT cheating.

This is truly horrifying.

Wow, just wow

Eh, the Holocaust is horrifying, slavery is horrifying, but not this which is nothing new. ACT/SAT has always been a scam.

“Horrifying” is a subjective feeling, @seokouji , and “more cynical than thou” is hardly an impressive pose.

This is pretty damning stuff.

Glad a real reporter is finally looking into it.

Pervasive cheating in foreign countries to gain acceptance and possible scholarship money at American institutions?!?!? Who would have thought?

I don’t know if I can say what I’m thinking. But it goes along the lines of looking to countries which are more scrupulous with testing. And the rest of it.

…Yeah that’s pretty horrifying if the ACT knows about this and doesn’t care because of the amount of money they’re getting.

If only it were just that–this is the ACT’s prep arm in Asia, licensed and sanctioned by (and profitable to) the ACT itself.

Horrifying reporting, if you ask me.

The article seems to suggest that the ACT itself was complicit in these wrongdoings, or rather allegations thereof, yet aside from the biased testimonies of disgruntled former teachers and students, was there actually any evidence of any type of cheating or fraudulent activities at any of these places?

Is that what they award Pulitzer prizes for these days: misleading reporting/misrepresentation of the facts?

@markmeyes - Here’s the wrongdoing: The ACT itself was licensing test centers that are also test prep businesses.

Places where students pay to increase their scores are receiving the exams in advance and then administering them. The fact that several people went on the record as having been given the exam beforehand is excellent evidence and evidence of excellent reporting. Where’s the misleading/misrepresentation?

Hmm, no response from a character who signed up just to slam the article and defend the shady, corrupt ACT…interesting…