I couldn’t agree with you more. Last week a drug addicted woman gave birth to baby on the sidewalk. People walk around with their pants down, and children walk past this on their way to school, and somehow people see this as normal. I love SF, but city officials are not doing enough, and whatever they are doing isn’t working.
I am deleting what I wrote here. Thank you @jym626 for your post—you said it all.
I am sorry you chose to delete your post. It was a balanced description of your experiences in SF. Hope you reconsider.
Thank you @jym626. Although I won’t be able recreate my post, I would say that my day in SF just a few months ago was wonderful. We had great food that my kid said rivaled what they had eaten in Beijing, enjoyed an in depth conversation with a store clerk whose son just graduated from med school, and looked at cheap jewelry and trinkets displayed outside on a sunny September afternoon.
When I lived in SF in 1991-1992, I was constantly afraid. The majority of my fear came from real and perceived violence both in my neighborhood and from that experienced by my students. From the quick google searches I did, SF had more violent crimes in the 1990s than it does now. Maybe this decrease is what I was picking up on.
Because of my experiences during 1991-1992 and all that I’ve read on the news and in the posts on this thread, I would have expected to be writing about all of the atrocities I saw or experienced that day. This just didn’t happen. This is not to say that I don’t believe anyone else’s experiences. I don’t doubt that a woman gave birth on the sidewalk, nor do I doubt that near the Civic Center one has to walk around numerous people who have no other place to live but the street. I am simply posting about my truth on one, very nice, day.
Again, who said it was “normal”? Please point that out.
1991-1992 was during the peak crime years in the US generally, so it is not surprising that most places in the US had much higher crime then than now.
Confirmed my side excursion to the Bay during my upcoming trip to LA. Going to be fun.
From The New York Times today:
The city has been very lax on prosecuting shoplifters. Whether right or wrong, there is a level of understanding for the homeless, and it gets taken advantage of.
from SF Chronicle Sunday…
https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/article/whole-foods-civic-center-17906567.php?cmpid=gsa-sfgate-result
It wasn’t solely a safety issue…
Yes, let’s keep saying that. Until we no longer can.
It seems WF is rectifying a poor business decision regardless of whether it’s crime or demographics or both that precipitated the closure.
Wow!
Not surprised, with the organized theft rings it will be extremely difficult for any retailer to remain in business.
It’ll be interesting to see where the crime rings move to next as the easy pickings dry up.
Do you blame them?
Nope!
It’s sad, though. I grew up in the SF Bay Area and when I was a kid, we’d take BART to SF and it was great fun just browsing through all of the fancy stores like Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus, etc. Now no more Nordstrom in downtown SF! Sad. But I’m not surprised.
The urban blight is going to spread. Downtown Portland, OR is having similar problems, with stores like REI closing their downtown flagship store after being there for YEARS. With big stores like that closing, crime rising, the police having 1 hand tied behind their backs because local city laws/ordinances prohibit them from arresting and prosecuting certain crimes, enough people are fed up that they’re leaving.
Businesses are leaving. People are moving away. And the people that do live close enough to visit are going to visit a lot less.
Before you know it, it’ll end up looking like Detroit did before Detroit started some of its urban revitalization stuff.
The article said nothing about “organized theft rings.”
Just bcos the NYT doesn’t include write about stuff doesn’t mean that other stuff doesn’t exist.
hint: there have been plenty of local articles about the theft rings and how they operate.