<p>im taking the SAT chemistry test on june 2, so about 2 and a half weeks. i have already read a Princeton Review book, and now i am in the midst of reading Barrons. so my question is should i just review my Princeton book (i highlighted most important facts in it) or read the Barrons book? ive taken practice tests:
1 PR: 730
Barrons diag: 680
Sparknotes: 660, 700
How much work do you guys think i need to get at least 780+?
if it helps i am taking a regular chemistry class in school which i have a 96 in.</p>
<p>Read my guide.</p>
<p>IMO, if you were able to get a 700 on sparknotes, you should be good. I got 200 points higher on the real thing than I did on sparknotes</p>
<p>well i just took the 3rd sparknotes test and i got a 570. there were some bugged questions where it didnt show the graphs or charts and then i checked my work and saw that i made quite a few dumb errors. should i be concerned about this major drop in score?</p>
<p>also stressedoutt which sparknotes test was your actual sat chem score 200 points higher than?</p>
<p>alright, I just looked up my SN chemistry tests, and I was a bit off from what I said before :o </p>
<p>on the real thing I got 750.</p>
<p>SN test 1: 600
SN test 2: 550
SN test 3: 630</p>