<p>yeah i put choice C revelation at something unexpected</p>
<p>does anybody remember the polemic question other choices?</p>
<p>nah....100% sure it is polemic...</p>
<p>i think i put polemic too, but there was once choice i MIGHT have put but i just really can't remember....</p>
<p>i remember a philanpoist (oops...sp..)</p>
<p>yeah it's revelation..gullibility makes that answer wrong</p>
<p>(umm.. philatropist? definitely not that one...)
not liturgical/other...
hm.</p>
<p>what about... I think it was the meaning of "false" or something. The choices were misleading, counterfeit, etc.</p>
<p>that was misleading</p>
<p>sweet....3/3</p>
<p>@ssbands04:
[quote]
What was the answer for the sum of the 50th and 51st terms?
f(-1) and g(2) or whatever was 0?
ummm, regressive, convoluted, blah blah
What about the question with the kids who generously helped to renovate...was the "to" not necessary?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>The sum of the 50th and 51st terms answer was 1 I believe.</p>
<p>i concur with patel...4/4 baby..:)</p>
<p>what is the question with strident</p>
<p>Hey guys, I have some question/argument.</p>
<p>1) writer- immoral because her characters didn’t always get punished
I said redemptive because the characters were not punished. (But honestly, I came to realize that "immoral" fits better)</p>
<p>2) developmental changes in English language
I remember putting not this, but something about the greatness of modern English. Because they weren't talking about developmental changes, but how the modern English is equal or perhaps even better than the languages of Homer/etc. </p>
<p>3) For the Chimpanzee passage, there was something like:
The passage two demonstrates how "danger" in passage one is
etc. etc. what was the answer for this one? </p>
<p>Your opinions please? Thanks :)</p>
<p>I can't agree with the nonchalant and perfuntory one cuz the verb is affect. How could the person affect such an enviornment by being perfuntory if the environment is already nonchalant. However, choice B, pugnacious and terse better serves the purpose as a pugnacious environment can be affected by the defender's terse comment.</p>
<p>no, it was that he KEPT the atmosphere nonchalant by giving perfunctory responses to the questions interrogated</p>
<p>i am really sure the verb is affect.....i was deciding between those two answers as well..but affect steers me toward that one..</p>
<p>for kyun, i can't remember the developmental question, but it was passage 2 demonstrated how passage one might have the danger of common human impulses or something along those lines. And yeah...it was immoral...transgressions.</p>
<p>^agree.
pugnacious means belligerent, right?</p>
<p>affect: pretend to have or feel (something)</p>
<p>that makes it perfunctory/nonchalant</p>
<p>Hey everyone~~I don't think the Asian Actor one unable to fool the blablabla~maybe it's they are scarse/different from other actors something like that, coz it mentioned that the opportunities are limited, and they are the few who can get them. Unable to fool wasn't mentioned in that area.</p>