<p>What do you consider yourself better at? Math or reading?
Look at your index finger and your ring finger. Which is higher? Or are they equal?
If your ring finger is higher than your index finger, then you are better at math.
If your ring finger is lower than your index finger, then you are better at reading.
If you are equal, then you are good at both. </p>
<p>Can anyone post if this is true? </p>
<p>I found a research about it. </p>
<p>Kids with longer ring fingers compared to index fingers are likely to have higher math scores than literacy or verbal scores on the college entrance exam, while children with the reverse finger-length ratio are likely to have higher reading and writing, or verbal, scores versus math scores. The researchers looked at boys' and girls' test performances separately and compared them to finger-length ratio measurements. They found a clear link between high prenatal testosterone exposure, indicated by the longer ring finger compared to the index finger, and higher scores on the math SAT.</p>
<p>Similarly, they found higher literacy SAT scores for the girls among those who had lower prenatal testosterone exposure, as indicated by a shorter ring finger compared with the index finger.</p>
<p>My ring finger is bigger than my index, and I got 800CR (well, on official practice tests, haven’t taken a real exam yet) without any prep at all, but I peak at like 690-700 math, even with some prep</p>
<p>O_o it works for me…my math score is higher than my CR.
But perhaps males are genetically favored to have longer ring fingers? There’s a reason why males exceed females in the math portion, and females the other way around. Or is that all what that testosterone prenatal mumbo jumbo is?</p>