<p>the second number was 2</p>
<p>hmm i think it is 30% then</p>
<p>Anyone know the answer to the electron microscope thingy? Choices were diodes, magnets, particle accelerator, etc… D:</p>
<p>Magnets </p>
<p>10char.</p>
<p>no…the answer is lenses</p>
<p>actually. nvm. :P</p>
<p>What score would i get? I omitted 12 and let’s say I missed 15 because I’m stupid</p>
<p>That would be a 690 on the blue book curve.</p>
<p>Thanks hopefully I got at least 700</p>
<p>what did people get for the thermodynamics q’s?
i think i went too fast past it and didnt properly read the scenario >.></p>
<p>What’s the curve for an 800 based on blue book? I don’t actually own blue book, only heard from people it’s -15 raw. </p>
<p>@ImErulisse: What was the thermo question again? If your talking about the glass thermometer/hot water question, it was:
Temp goes down then up because glass expands before water.
Cup cracks because inside expands before outside</p>
<p>for the thermometer and the hot water question, the answers were which choices? D and C? or D, D?</p>
<p>oh nooo XD lol it was the one with something about heat going in with the temp of the source (?) and the temp of the sink (?) i cant really remember it and its scaring me T.T</p>
<p>Whats a good physics score for Columbia university?</p>
<p>are we speculating a generous curve for this sat ? do you think it was way harder than the tests from before?</p>
<p>I think I’m cancelling guys… Try it out again in july or so :/</p>
<p>I’m going to be taking this in June and I was wondering what you recommend studying with? Any review books in particular that you found more helpful/accurate with what the test covered?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>@ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO:
Barrons was around the actual test I thought, but there were some stuff on Barrons that weren’t on the actual test. Sparknotes had some errors with answers/questions. PR was a little easier than the actual test.</p>
<p>Can someone tell do you have an answer in this test like…a/3</p>
<p>so, how was the curve?</p>