<p>How do you define a “fair” advantage then? Is being born into better circumstances or being inherently more intelligent a “fair” advantage? And if you tend to be unscrupulous in your attempts to “get ahead,” then your score does represent your character. How much do you really value a true representation of oneself, anyway? Almost every person I know who wants to attend a competitive college (including myself) has taken a class he/she didn’t particularly care for in order to polish his/her credentials. For some people, this even extends to joining clubs they don’t have any strong interest in. Is this representative of their true selves and their true passions? No – they are being dishonest. But it’s a dishonest world, so I don’t reserve any particular repugnance for those who cheat on tests.</p>
<p>but seriously all cheating is is survival of the fittest. The SAT is like the jungle.
You do what you have to to survive. You only think of yourself. If your not as smart, then you must find some other way of getting the same score. Some cheat, others study hard. That is the game of life. You play to win</p>
<p>Some people take it in a crowded cafeteria or gymnasium in which there are over 100 people; not all of them are closely monitored. When you think about it, what incentive does a proctor really have to discourage cheating? He’s not going to get paid more if he does.</p>
<p>Perhaps, but that doesn’t tend to happen; proctors aren’t getting paid enough to administer a 3-hour test to make them care. And when was the last time you heard of a student filing a formal report against another for cheating?</p>
<p>The boy next to me (who is a Senior with a basketball scholarship- why is he taking the SAT again? who knows) slept through the essay and filled in only a few bubbles for each section. My friend said he took the SAT in May with her. LOL</p>