<p>My D plans to apply to Princeton Class of 2014, with the Woodrow Wilson School as the ultimate goal. She’s definitely not a math/science person, and that’s reflected in her lopsided SAT scores. I’d appreciate some input on whether she ought to retake Math II or even the SAT reasoning test. She’s assuming she must retake the Math II, but I’m not so sure, especially given the recent postings that say P will now require only 2 subject tests.</p>
<p>Hope this isn’t too tedious, but I’ll lay out all the data:</p>
<p>SAT Subject tests: Literature 780, US History 750, Math II 650</p>
<p>SAT reasoning - took this as a trial run before opting to focus on the ACT: 2120/ CR 770, M 620, W 730 (9 E)</p>
<p>ACT with writing: 35 composite (E 35, M 33, R 36, S 34, essay 8). The score correlates to around 1560 SAT for CR+M, and 690 for SAT Writing, thanks to the low essay grade. </p>
<p>Her transcript will be strong, but she’s gotten B+ grades consistently in math classes so that will appear as a weakness despite the extreme rigor of her high school. She’s currently debating whether to continue on with Calculus as a senior, or take Statistics instead. (any advice on that?)</p>
<p>To compound the lopsidedness, her 2 teacher recs will be from English and History teachers, and both should be excellent. Her math and science teachers like her well enough, but she feels like the English and History teachers better know her strengths in writing and analysis.</p>
<p>So… given this profile, what option would you recommend?</p>
<li><p>Send ACT and Lit + History scores (assuming P moves to the 2-test requirement)</p></li>
<li><p>Send ACT + all 3 subject tests (assuming 3 are required).</p></li>
<li><p>Retake Math II and hope to get it up to 700, and send that along with ACT and Lit+ History.</p></li>
<li><p>Ignore the Math II, but retake the SAT reasoning to see if it’s good enough to submit as a supplement to the ACT score. She could probably do quite a lot better on this, since she’s now had some experience with studying and taking the exams. Still, with a 35 ACT, it may be goofy to retake the SAT. You can attribute this question to a nagging doubt about whether ACT is really as strong as SAT in the minds of the admissions officers. Reassurance, anyone?</p></li>
</ol>
<p>We know tests aren’t everything, but it would be a shame to be thwarted by a situation that has a relatively simple solution. She’s a kid with great EC’s (8 varsity letters, 2-sport captain, lots of service and other community involvement), and would love to have a shot at Princeton.</p>
<p>Thanks for any input you can offer.</p>