<p>I think the issue here was that the high school does provide the accommodations needed by the OP’s child, and the OP’s child had already demonstrated through his ISEE’s and grades, that he was a viable candidate for that school. The school, after being alerted that the OP’s child had an LD when the OP inquired about accommodations, then told the OP that while the accommodations were available, they would only be given if the student’s medical records were provided during the admissions process. Which is not OK, and may not be consistent with the law.</p>
<p>Of course, no one wants his kid in an environment that is hostile to his presence and his needs. But on the flip side, if there is an institution that the kid has good and specific reasons for wanting to attend and where the kid is capable of doing the work, to my mind it is not OK for the kid to be kept out as a function of the LD. </p>
<p>At the pre-college level, our hs was so good about it that I don’t want to say we “fought,” but we certainly did very time intensive and just plain intense advocacy to keep our kid there even though his accommodations were unusual for them. (Not unheard of, just unusual.) If the school had made his life miserable, it probably wouldn’t have been worth it, but he loved the place and was capable of doing very well there both socially and academically. So yeah, even if the administration had somehow changed and they hadn’t been as enthusiastic about supporting him, I would not have taken our marbles and gone home.</p>
<p>On the college level, assuming the college has a reasonable support office and the needed accommodations are available for students with medical documentation, I think that the issue of whether or not to reveal or be up front is a much trickier issue. If the student chooses to reveal, I think this should be his or her prerogative. But I’m not sure that the attitude of “if they don’t want my kid, the heck with them, there are plenty of other colleges” necessarily serves all LD students. What if there are a couple of particular colleges that are the student’s top choices for good reason and the colleges clearly have support offices that are doing their job. </p>
<p>I tremendously admire how kartwheelie, who has posted on other threads, has taken the bull by the horns and moved forward proactively to find herself schools that are an excellent fit, being very up front with the schools about her needs. But I also think that there are students whose approach is: I want this school; they have exactly the academic program I want; the accommodations I need are available there: I want admissions to judge me on my qualifications alone and not consider or even know about my LD in deciding whether to admit me.</p>
<p>My sense is that the OP and her S were in this latter category. Her S was qualified and it seemed quite squirrely of the school to demand his medical records in the course of admissions when there were academic records that showed he could do the work and was a competitive candidate. And the threat that no accommodations would be forthcoming unless those records were forked over during admissions must have felt like blackmail.</p>
<p>Obviously, the records have to be forked over once a student is admitted so the school has documentation that demonstrates what accommodations are needed. But how do you explain the school demanding the documentation while making the decision? It certainly appears that the student’s LD was going to be taken into account even though he had other records showing that he could do the work. And that does not seem right.</p>