<p>
</p>
<p>Wait, I’m confused. To which school are we comparing? Stanford? Since when does Stanford have an undergrad b-school? Granted, Harvard and Stanford don’t need undergrad vocations/trades. The higher level u’s in the country generally don’t. This is the model to which UCLA subscribes, albeit probably wrongly. The U needs undergrad business; bring it back. Granted, there are UCLA grads in chem, engineering, the sciences in general, and even some of the non-econ social sciences that do well in quantitative fields, leaving the humanities majors to sales/marketing and pub relations. But it doesn’t match the success, obviously, of Harvard or Stanford. You’ll see a Harvard grad in Lit deep into quant on Wall Street. Harvard tends to taunt us with this: “See my in French degree?” “Wall Street, baby…”</p>