<p>I am wondering in general, how is the science programs at Amherst? I am thinking about applying with a double major in biology and economics.... any opinions will be appreciated!!</p>
<p>Do you mean the biology department specifically?</p>
<p>em… I think so… also the general science atmosphere there… since I only know that Harvey Mudd, Haverford, and Reed are LACs especially strong in science programs… Thanks Bourne… any input?</p>
<p>Amherst has a pretty good bio program with lots of student feedback and student/teacher interaction which makes their dept more flexible.</p>
<p>It comes with all the perks of being a top 3 LAC, so the dept is well funded and there are plenty of independent research opportunities and summer research programs.</p>
<p>The only criticism I’ve heard, anecdotally of course, is about the Chem pre-reqs to some of the Bio classes. </p>
<p>Anything specific?</p>
<p>If you are interested in a future advanced degree, and if you can get into Amherst, you can probably get into one or more of the top ten future biology PhD producers listed at [REED</a> COLLEGE PHD PRODUCTIVITY](<a href=“http://web.reed.edu/ir/phd.html]REED”>Doctoral Degree Productivity - Institutional Research - Reed College).</p>
<p>Thanks Bourne… You were talking about that there are too many chem pre-requisites for a bio major student? </p>
<p>Vossron… Thanks for the suggestion! How do u evaluate the correlation between phd productivity and their education quality? Producing more phds means that they have flexible and well-designed undergrad programs?</p>
<p>The PhD numbers apply mainly to those interested in doing bio research where a PhD is a requirement; you know that these schools do a relatively good job at preparation for such positions. I don’t know about flexible (perhaps studying their department pages and course catalogs would be indicative), but they’re likely well-designed for what they do. If you’re not interested in research (or academia), then these schools might not be the best choice.</p>
<p>“Thanks Bourne… You were talking about that there are too many chem pre-requisites for a bio major student?”–Ronaldo1988</p>
<p>Chemistry is essential to understanding biology.</p>
<p>No No, not that there are too many … Almost all Bio programs require you to take intro Chem/Physics classes. </p>
<p>Nvm, like I said it’s anecdotal.</p>
<p>Amherst has a great program.</p>