<br>
<br>
<p>Easy enough to say “get rid of the frats,” but how about an actual realistic plan? There is a reason why so many Dartmouth presidents favored getting rid of the frats but all of them failed to actually do so. And that reason is money. </p>
<p>And by money I mean both higher expense (to buy out the frats and build dorms to make up the instant housing gap) and lower income (from reduced donations from alumni who fiercely love their old frats and and would be outraged were they abolished).</p>
<p>Griping about problems is easy. Solving them is hard. So what’s the plan? Where is all the money to pull this off going to come from? </p>
<br>
<br>
<p>Radical? Get real. More like absurd. As long as we indulging in silly nonsense, how about proposing to pack up the whole college and move it to New York city, or maybe to France? That would certainly change the culture on campus. </p>
<p>I have read this thread with interest. And like Consolation, I think the frats are a net negative for Dartmouth and would like to see them gone or at least much reduced in importance and prominence in the social life of the college. But I don’t have a clear vision on how to pull that off, because, as I said above, it would cost a lot more than the school could afford. </p>
<p>So since I don’t have a sweeping solution I’m left thinking/hoping the new president will do what he can with cards he is dealt. Which IMO would include immediately expelling any student shown to have engaged in any sort of racism, sexual misconduct, or criminal behavior as well as immediately disbanding any frat shown to shown to engage in harmful hazing or allowing underage drinking on its premises. No probation. No second chances. Just serve notice that the frat boy culture is changing, and then enforce it. </p>
<p>You may consider that to be just more “half assing,” but I try to deal in approaches that are realistic to the actual situation on the ground rather than promoting sweeping, simplistic much-easier-said-than-done dreams and non-answers.</p>
<p>And the one thing I do not favor is the school and its students trashing itself in the press. Trying to convince the public in general and prospective students in particular that Dartmouth is a terrible place to go to college helps no one and does nothing to solve the problems. Instead everyone should be trying to promote the school for the many great qualities and opportunities it has and at the same time try to recruit reform-minded new students who are interested in helping to solve the problems making the place even better. Kick out the bad apples and replace them with good, but don’t cut down the whole tree.</p>
<p>But even if we succeed in getting rid of the frats, that will help only so much. Because, barring some of the absurdities mentioned above, the one thing about Dartmouth that no amount of reform is going to change is its location. Let’s face it. Hanover is a small, isolated place in a cold climate. Colleges in that situation very often end up with an alcohol-fueled party culture whether they have frats or not. Consider the examples of both Williams and Middlebury. Both are small, remote schools that abolished their frats decades ago. The frats are gone but the drinking culture persists to this day. </p>
<p>So I agree that it would be great if Dartmouth’s frats all went away, but I don’t kid myself that this alone will solve all its social problems. No amount of reform by the college is going turn Hanover into Boston or NYC. So to a significant degree Dartmouth students will always turn to whatever fun and social outlets there are available to them.</p>