<p>I got a 28 on my ACT (E:28, M:32, R:24, S:27)</p>
<p>I got a 1840 on my first SAT I (R:620, M:640, W:580)
On my second SAT I I got a 1900 (R:560, M:670, W:670) </p>
<p>Or should I send in both?</p>
<p>i would send ur SAT score because superscored you have a 1960.</p>
<p>thanks, anyone else?</p>
<p>I think you should send both</p>
<p>thanks anyone else</p>
<p>Well when I called a school they told me my ACT score (also 28) was the equivalent to 1260 on the SATs.</p>
<p>nd is right…here’s the sat-act concordance table:
<a href=“College Board - SAT, AP, College Search and Admission Tools”>College Board - SAT, AP, College Search and Admission Tools;
<p>assuming the schools where you are applying weigh the M+CR more heavily than the W, as most do, then your superscored 1290 (virtually all schools superscore SATs, but not ACTs) is better than your ACT equivalent of 1260.</p>
<p>Hmmm – does anyone have a more recent concordance table? This one pre-dates the new SAT, and doesn’t include writing scores for either the SAT or the ACT. It asserts that scores on the CR & Math sections of the new SAT should be similar to those on the the verbal and math sections, but I thought that the evidence suggested that wasn’t correct.</p>
<p>[How</a> SAT and ACT Scores Compare | The Princeton Review](<a href=“SAT Prep Options | SAT Courses | The Princeton Review”>SAT Prep Options | SAT Courses | The Princeton Review)
not very satisfying</p>
<p>read this thread for more on the subject
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-act-tests-test-preparation/365021-act-sat-conversion-percentiles.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-act-tests-test-preparation/365021-act-sat-conversion-percentiles.html</a></p>
<p>looks like this Florida concordance study uses more recent data…& its further broken down, e.g., ACT math to SAT math
<a href=“http://www.fldoe.org/evaluation/xls/actsatct.xls[/url]”>http://www.fldoe.org/evaluation/xls/actsatct.xls</a></p>
<p>Send both.</p>
<p>Yes, send both.</p>