<br>
<br>
<p>Well I didn’t see where you’re talking about over $300K.</p>
<p>But don’t you think that people that make over $300K will figure out a
way to shelter that income? And the people that are way over $300K
will look at moving to changing citizenship?</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>Well, we have some strong disagreements on who pays for what and how
much. But I have the benefit of experience.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>Society as a whole benefits from people without college too. Not all
of them. But not all people that go to college benefit society in the
amount that you want society to benefit them with.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>The guy I know works for a foreign multinational. He does deals in the
$100 million and up range. And he knows the technology that he sells
for his company better than anyone else. He’s a former mercenary. I
talked to him about what he does for his company and I would have
expected a background in geology and chemical engineering. I spoke to
his wife and she told me that he’s never gone to college. He worked
with lots of engineers and studied on his own because he didn’t like
knowing less than they did.</p>
<p>Bill Gates does mean a lot - he started an industry responsible for
hundreds of thousands if not millions of jobs. The guy I work for has
done similarly. In many, many cases, it’s the person; not the
education.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>But we also benefit from his spending - that’s one of the arguments
made for subsidizing education.</p>
<p>If you don’t like tech executives, there are always sports stars that
didn’t go to college like Roger Federer, Novak Djokovic, Serena and
Venus Williams. They provide entertainment and health benefits, jobs
to companies like Wilson, Head, Nike, Adidas, distribution and retail
jobs and jobs for those in the media.</p>
<p>Should they get a subsidy?</p>