"It was bound to happen, and, not surprisingly in California. The University of California (UC) is being sued in state court because it requires applicants for admission to take either the SAT or ACT test. The allegation, unquestionably factually correct, is that minority students generally do poorly on standardized admissions tests and thus are not admitted in large numbers to the prestigious university, forcing them to attend other less competitive schools, endangering lifetime job prospects.
Facing political and potentially judicial pressure, UC may capitulate and make the school test optional –a task force is looking into it, and the chancellor of the Berkeley campus favors it. In my opinion, doing that would be a big mistake: arguably America’s greatest public university would be rejecting what historical experience suggests is very good predictive indicator of the likely collegiate success of students. Why? Because it produces a student body whose ethnic/racial composition does not comport with that favored by the plaintiffs in the lawsuit and current progressive notions of distributive justice. Moreover, it is an attempt to judicially undermine the voters of California, who constitutionally mandated two decades ago in a amendment modeled after the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 that California public institutions shall not use race, sex or ethnicity criteria in admission decisions (Proposition 209)." …
https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardvedder/2019/12/16/should-the-sat-test-be-outlawed/#3a540ff13dd8