Should the Sophie Freund of 1991 went to Jonathan Farley or Constantin Teleman

i read somewhere that telaman had 24 as, 1 a minus in 3 years while farley had 29 as 3 a minuses in 3 years

but if Teleman went another year, he would of not of beaten Farley am i correct?

does anyone know what the logical thing would be to do in this situation?

I don’t understand what you’re asking.

This is a controversy from almost 25 years ago. This is the Globe article.
http://www.latticetheory.net/media/pdf/boston_globe.pdf

And why is this important now?

just curious thats all, gibby