<p>I'll be applying to graduate school in the fall and I'm looking for programs in second language acquisition that do not require teaching. I am not an aspiring teacher, but I am doing it more so for research purposes. I have studied a few languages but my level of fluency is not at a point in which I would be in any way qualified to give public instruction. Additionally, I just loath it and have no dsire to do it nor is it in my forseeable future anyway.</p>
<p>It appears as though it's impossible to find any such programs. I have read some descriptions that sounded perfect untill I get toward the bottom of the page and see "students expected to teach a language"-CMU for example.</p>
<p>yeah, indeed most sla programs don't require teaching. SLA is second language acquisition, but CMU's program is more like second language "learning". And their program is crappy, stay away!!</p>
<p>Go to sla programs within Linguistics departments. Those programs definitely stay away from teaching side, coz otherwise they would be more like education faculties.</p>
<p>If u r qualified enough, choose one of the top sla programs in the world: </p>
<p>There is something wrong then. Coz I am 100% sure they don't require teaching. At least MIT and McGill. Well, they might require you to teach some Ling. classes though. But they don't require you to be like a teacher of foreign languages. And for McGill, if u want u may not teach, but they will cut a lil bit from your salary. Or they might give you research assistantship. At MIT also, you might get RAship, and not teach.</p>
<p>I would suggest you teach though. I mean Ling and SLA classes. That wud giv ya exp[erience. But I would personally also not like to teach a foerign language, which is stupid for a linguist to do.</p>