<p>I think for Calc II it's extremely intense.</p>
<p>Is that intro to analysis, complex analysis, or real analysis?</p>
<p>[hijack]</p>
<p>
[quote]
Йыовое еш ыооп уреую ещлы шулрвлао-тф щлфнерышф?</p>
<p>20 сзтеы?!
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Okay, I've only been self-studying Russian for a month, but even I can tell that the above "sentences" are complete gibberish. "Eeyih'ovoye yesh ih'oop uryeuoo yeshchylih shulrvlao-tf-shchylfnerih'shf? 20 sztyeih?!" Is how the "sentences" above would be read. See, gibberish.</p>
<p>[/hijack]</p>
<p>
[quote]
In Soviet Russia, math problem solves YOU!
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Hahaha. One of the few moments I have actually laughed out loud on CC.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Wait, how is that intense? I'm a junior in Analysis and I had around 150 pages of notes the first semester.....and they were mandatory because we got a grade on them.....homework around 300 pages..... so yeah that's not intense at all considering he is in college.
[/quote]
we're talking first semester calculus, when most students have been at least 3 months away from the only calculus they've ever had...not 5th semester analysis. and i've heard enough about analysis, our professor always tried to get us to take classes in it later in undergrad.</p>
<p>I think they were referring to the class that I took, which was very much not Calc II.</p>
<p>Which Euler's constant was he talking about, the one that's around 2.7182818, or the one that's around .577? It would only be really insane to be going on about the second one. Also, showing the gamma function is a continuous function that acts like factorial on the integers is pretty much just an integration by parts calculation.</p>
<p>
[quote]
In Soviet Russia, math problem solves YOU!
[/quote]
</p>
<p>LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>haha this thread is funny
alright I'll go to the USAMO website and pull some problems out for ya</p>
<p>
[quote]
Which Euler's constant was he talking about, the one that's around 2.7182818, or the one that's around .577? It would only be really insane to be going on about the second one. Also, showing the gamma function is a continuous function that acts like factorial on the integers is pretty much just an integration by parts calculation.
[/quote]
this is a late response, but the .577 one. and trust me, it WAS insane to even try it...by the end of that lecture period alone, he could see the dejection in our faces and he pointed it out, and had to give us an "inspirational" speech about doing things you never thought yourself capable of (our final in the class was no more than 2 weeks away, so we were clearly concerned).</p>