<p>Here's the info from Guilford's Common Data Set, looks like you are right afan:</p>
<p>
[quote]
Report for the cohort of full-time first-time bachelor's (or equivalent) degree-seeking undergraduate students who entered in fall 1996. Include in the cohort those who entered your institution during the summer term preceding fall 1996.</p>
<p>B4. Initial 1996 cohort of first-time, full-time bachelor's (or equivalent) degree-seeking undergraduate students; total all students: 276</p>
<p>B5. Of the initial 1996 cohort, how many did not persist and did not graduate for the following reasons: deceased, permanently disabled, armed forces, foreign aid service of the federal government, or official church missions; total allowable exclusions: 0</p>
<p>B6. Final 1996 cohort, after adjusting for allowable exclusions: 276
(Subtract question B5 from question B4)</p>
<p>B7. Of the initial 1996 cohort, how many completed the program in four years or less (by August 31, 2000): 142</p>
<p>B8. Of the initial 1996 cohort, how many completed the program in more than four years but in five years or less (after August 31, 2000 and by August 31, 2001): 37</p>
<p>B9. Of the initial 1996 cohort, how many completed the program in more than five years but in six years or less (after August 31, 2001 and by August 31, 2002): 8</p>
<p>B10. Total graduating within six years (sum of questions B7, B8, and B9): 187</p>
<p>B11. Six-year graduation rate for 1996 cohort (question B10 divided by question B6): 68%
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Still,. I don't think the Guilford grad rate is a huge negative mark when compared to other schools that accept students with similar profiles (Lynchburg, Roanoke).</p>