<p>When I read the data sets from sources like that linked on #397 above, I can tell about the vintage from the tuition listed; that is a precise number in any given year that I am now very familiar with. (And the tuition given was for 2012-2013.) A recent alumnus/alumna wrote the following on that same site: “I love everything about this school, and it has been the happiest 4 years of my life. I highly recommend that you look into it more deeply. It may not have the name recognition of Andover or St. Paul’s but that is because very little emphasis is placed on branding or standardized testing scores, and more on producing inquisitive, intelligent and happy alumnae. There are some really inspirational teachers there”. </p>
<p>I heard one of the most influential of trustees say recently that the “branding” issue is front and center on his agenda. To what end, exactly, I am still unsure, but he seems to want more brand recognition at the very least.</p>
<p>With a sophomore who took a practice PSAT last October, and did very well, I am one who is now a little less vexed about figuring out the school’s approach to standardized testing. As the quote above reveals, and as corroborated from a discussion with the parent of a recent alumnus, the school does not go out of its way to provide SAT prep on campus. Links are furnished by CC to self-help resources (as stated in the published viewbook), and I am unaware of classroom work targeted for the SAT. </p>
<p>Also in the viewbook, the school writes, under “Examinations and Assessments”, that it is “the leading independent school in the country in the use of the College and Work Readiness Assessment (CWRA), an innovative written exam that eschews a traditional multiple-choice format.” There several more sentences following devoted to this test, and virtually nothing about the SAT. I know that Mr. Roach is a progressive independent educator much steeped in the writings of Ted Sizer and Grant Wiggins. “Authentic” assessment is a big deal, and I don’t think that he considers the SAT to be the final word. Does this mean Mr. Roach is nonplussed by the comparative results given in #400? Don’t really know, but he surely is confident about the graduates overall, and their matriculations seem fine. </p>
<p>I also don’t really know why the average scores are in the lower 1900s, but assume that other schools listed above, a.) provide more specific SAT prep, and b.) take fewer chances on kids who might test lower coming into the school, and still set a lower floor later on when the SATs are taken. If a school says that its median SSAT is 84%, as SAS does, that allows for however many admits who scored in the 50s or 60s. Maybe some of them don’t get a whole lot better in three years at performing on standardized multiple choice SATs. </p>
<p>Whatever the case, I can’t believe that the teaching at SAS is somehow inferior to that at TCDAMLE, certainly not based on just these SAT results. My two kids ('16 and '17) are learning a lot at SAS, and they do so readily, without complaining. They like the teaching (and teachers, perhaps more importantly), and they instantly figured out early in III Form that this is about far more than the memorization that made them so successful in middle school.</p>