<p>According to the FA brochure, the total count of students receiving aid is 166, around 31% of the student body, so I guess the other 6% are faculty kids?</p>
<p>Well, the FA brochure has the numbers (broken down by income level) and the “facts and figures” has the percentage. I think both are up-to-date ('10-'11 school year), and that’s why I speculate that the inconsistency may be expalained by the fact that faculty kids are not counted in the “FA received by income level” in the FA brochure.</p>
<p>DAndrew, the discrepancy may be explained by special-interest scholarships? Winterset or others could correct me, but St. Paul’s does have a few special-interest scholarships:</p>
<p>That could explain the difference, as I theorized. The scholarships have a preference for financial need, but I presume, from the phrasing, that they might not always be awarded solely on the basis of financial need. (And, again, anyone who knows something, please jump in!)</p>
<p>I’m fairly certain that any children of faculty receiving financial aid would be counted in the FA statistics.</p>
<p>Could be? But these “special interest scholarships” can still be considered need based or partially need based aid. I don’t know. If you look at Exeter’s “Facts” sheet, it separates faculty kids by saying 47% of students on aid and if including faculty kids 49%. So I guess they could be counting faculty kids out as it is a benefit to the school’s staff, which comes from a different budget?</p>
<p>OK. We just added a few more by asking and answering the significance of the question. My last post in response to Periw’s might be the last on this topic if no new info from anyone else. But really, SevenDad, 158 pages on an open forum. We really can’t expect that we like every post.</p>