<p>minderbender, if there is one thing I’ve learned after two years on CC and going through the college process with two kids, is that you cannot judge a college by either a brief campus visit OR a few CC posters that rub you the wrong way. Those both lead to very superficial impressions that should not sway one in what far too important and complex a decision.</p>
<p>I know I’m in a minority on CC when I disagree that the typical campus visit is a good way to judge whether a kid is the right “fit” for the school. Most people here recommend that you go to the school and see if you get that vibe that tells you if you could be happy there for four years. I happen to think now that this is BS–for good or for bad, your college experience is so much more than the school’s setting and the mood you are in when you visit. It would be like judging a person based on your first meeting and then being able to guess if you’ll turn out to be really great friends or not. My D also was not so impressed with Princeton after the visit. We actually didn’t go on the tour (went off on our own a bit to look at the empty August campus) because after the info session in what seemed a stodgy, pretentious hall, my over-tired, atheist, liberal daughter was not really interested in continuing.</p>
<p>As for CC, it is an echo chamber for stereotypes and shallow impressions that get bandied about on every college forum. The whole idea that people that go to one school are a certain personality type is so overblown on here as to be ridiculous. Do certain schools have more of an attraction for a certain type of people? Possibly. But how much that actually affects the ratio of that type on campus is questionable. For decades now, selective universities have made point to foment diversity, not just in race and geography, but in culture and interests. Stanford, Princeton and all the rest do NOT want any “typical” student to represent them…and you can bet the make an effort to counter those impressions. What’s more, they all take “character” into consideration, through recommendations, essays and interviews, so while many kids with lousy personalities still get through, no one can claim that one school is better at filtering them then another. </p>
<p>You, in fact, seem to be very much a part of that echo chamber…You made one visit to campus and think you know the overall culture of the school, and to back you up, you use the comment of another poster who has yet to attend the school and admits his impression is based on reputation. You seem to have created an account to make your post, as it doesn’t sound like you are new to CC. Shall we judge all the people at Stanford based on this cowardly behavior?</p>
<p>My D didn’t really start looking closely at her options until after April 1st when it came down to between three great choices. I can tell you that of those, she knew the most about and loved Brown, but that was definitely based on superficial perceptions and reputation. When she started looking into what Princeton has to offer in the way of resources, research and academic experience, as well as reviews from students and alums in person and online. She knew that it provided the best shot of giving her the best overall experience. No guarantees–and she might have been very happy at Brown or elsewhere, but for her particular goals and interests, she made a judgement based on tangible factors. </p>
<p>Maybe many kids who are fortunate enough to have excellent choices make their decisions based on the intangibles and their “gut” but to use the comments of anonymous posters, who vary from helpful to obnoxious on all college forums, as an excuse not to attend a school is dumb.</p>